borderline between the Jewish and Iraqi forces, in a place between Ijzim and Jenin. The Iraqi officer  sends  a  letter  to  the  Jewish  officer  in  which  he  talks  on  behalf  of  the  local  Arab farmers who were shot by the Jewish army while trying to access their land. He notes that Jews are now collecting the Arab crops and that such a deed has no “military spirit.” In order to solve the problem he calls for a meeting, to which the two parties should come unarmed.37 This meeting indeed took place. Such local initiatives are perhaps indicators to the general disorderly state of affairs. However, the Iraqis did provide some assistance to the local Palestinian fighters. We know from the IDFA records that there was a flow of arms and products between the “little triangle” and the area occupied by the Iraqi forces, especially when the little triangle was under siege.38 Abu¯ Ashraf said that: “At night time we would go from Ijzim to ’A¯ ra [20 km south of Ijzim]. The Iraqi Army was stationed there. We would go and bring bullets on camels. At night. Past the Jews. I also went a few times”. The documents show that the Jewish army knew of the open route through the mountains: An informer reports Ijzim’s fighters have good contacts with the village of ’A¯ ra and Umm az-Zi¯na¯t [a village roughly 8 kms east of Ijzim]. ’A¯ ra is held by the Iraqis and they have a big force there. Iraqi soldiers visit Ijzim. Last week Ijzim’s leaders visited ’A¯ ra and the Iraqi commander notified them that when the truce is over, there will be a general attack on Haifa from the direction of Mishmar Ha’emeq by the regular forces, with air and sea forces.39 He notified them not to allow Arabs into Haifa and to tell the Arabs of Haifa to keep away from it due to the danger.40 The circumstances under which Palestinian villagers left their villages are at the heart of public  (as  well  as  private)  discussion.  In  the  case  of  the  Carmel  district,  although  some inhabitants were evacuated, the fighters were encouraged and even forced to stay. In at -T i ¯reh, twenty kilometers north of Ijzim, many of the women and children were evacuated by the Jordanian Legion in an organized manner. This protection of the family and especially the women  is  linked  to the  central  role of honor  (sharaf ) in Arab society. A man’s  honor  is dependent on the prevention of any harm, and especially sexual harm, inflicted on his women kin. Therefore, the men felt it necessary to keep the women and girls away from any potential damage, while they remained to fight. However, in retrospect, some villagers considered the disintegration of families during the war a detrimental factor. In an interview in his Irbid home  Abu¯  Wasfi¯,  at -T ireh’s  mukhta¯r  (headman)  and  a  prominent  figure  in  the  district, mentioned the evacuation of the women and children. His comment provoked a remark (or was it an accusation?) from Abu¯ Majdi¯, who was sitting with us and was a child in at -T i ¯reh in 1948:A I have one question to ask, Abu ¯  Wasfi¯: The reason that the women and children were sent away and the men remained—what was the planned policy?. . .. Was it the politics of the forces from outside or from within? Ya’ani¯, when my mother and my wife left, what was left for me to do? This comment sparked a debate among the men in the room. The underlying assumption was that the village was much more vulnerable when the circumstances of war did not permit the  preservation  of  the  usual  social  order.  Generally,  the  social  fabric  of  the  village  was portrayed as rural and traditional, where gender roles were clearly delineated (Abu¯  Ra¯shed 1993).  The  evacuation  of  the  women  and  children  in  April  1948  entailed  new  domestic arrangements—who would cook for the men? Who would do the laundry? Moreover, it was not  only  the  practicalities  that  posed  difficulties;  it  was  the  image  of  the  village  as  a functioning unit that was shattered, even before it fell to Jewish hands. The  Iraqi  army  was  a  new  factor  intervening  in  the  regular  social  order.  That  may explain the villagers’ reluctance to allow the Iraqis to base themselves in the village or to fight on their behalf. However, when the situation got graver (especially from the middle of July), the Jizma¯wi¯s called on the Iraqis to join the fighting and yet this assistance failed to  arrive.H EFRAT BEN-ZE’EV 20