Menu
His remarks sounded familiar - I had already heard them before. Suddenly I remembered: About 10 years ago they were uttered by our defense minister, Ehud Barak. Haaretz journalist Gideon Levy had asked him then, as a candidate for prime minister, what he would do had he been born Palestinian and Barak replied frankly: "I would join a terror organization."
This is not my own answer; terrorism by individuals or organizations or states is always aimed at exacting casualties in a civilian population that has not drawn any blood. Not only is terror blind - consuming both the saint and the sinner - it also expands the circle of the hot-headed, whose blood rises to their brains: Our blood is on their heads, their blood is on our heads. And when an account of the blood of the innocent is opened, who can pay it in full, and when?
I hate all the terrorists in the world, whatever the purpose of their struggle. However, I support every active civil revolt against any occupation, and Israel too is among the despicable occupiers. Such revolt is both more just and more effective, and it does not extinguish one's spark of humanity. And perhaps I'm just too much of an old codger to be a terrorist.
But, and pay attention to this but, if a normative young person has a spontaneous answer that is different from mine, and that answer also escaped the mouth of an Israeli lieutenant general, then every individual must see himself as though his son is running with the wrong crowd. If things were the other way around, our son-whom-we-loved would be a damned terrorist, almost certainly, because he is of the third and fourth generation of refugeehood and oppression, and whence cometh salvation? He has nothing to lose but his chains.
Whereas we, his mother and father, would be weeping for the departing son because he will never return to see the land of his birth and us, except in his photograph on the wall as a shahid, a martyr. Would we detain him before he carries out his plan? Would we be able to hold him back if we wanted to? Would we not understand what he is feeling? What Ehud Barak understood in his day - would that be impossible for us to understand?
Young people who have no future will easily give up their future, which they can't see on the horizon. Their past as guttersnipes and their present as cursed unemployed idlers lock the opening to their hope: Their death is better than their life, and their death is even better than our life, as their oppressors - that is how they feel. From the day they are born to the day they leave this earth, they see their land ahead, to which they will not come as free people.
There are no good and bad peoples; there are only leaderships that behave responsibly or insanely. And now we are fighting those whom a goodly number of us would be like, had we been in their place for 41 and a half years.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=1052057
Over 700 Oral History interviews (including 3,500+ hours of recording) can be viewed online.
Post Your Comment
*It should be NOTED that your email address won't be shared, and all communications between members will be routed via the website's mail server.
Just a reminder, more than 15,000 profit been sent to earth from GOD, More than half been killed by Jews, you can Imaging if they kill profits, why can’t the kill human being, that is their nature.
Have a good day cousins, see you in HELL
I have no grudge against any jew outside Palestine ,we muslims respect every living being but we're defending our right to live on our land ,no one should deny us this right.
Therefore, in throwing off the bonds of "occupation" and "colonialism", I would throw off their religious legacies as well by converting back to the faith my ancestors were forced to leave behind.
Shalom/Salam
We have been thinking perhaps. if pre-1948 Palestine were the be restored, with an inclusive power-sharing government, giving equal poltical rights to Jews, Muslims, Christians, whatever, with the right of return for all displaced in 1948, and compensation where their land is currently occupied by settler Jews, without displacing the latter, would this be a workable political model? Call it Palestein perhaps, to distinguish it from the earlier name, and acknowledge the presence of an immigrant Jewish population, whose historic connection does need recognition, but not as exclusive occupants of a mythical 'promised land'.
The so-called 'two-state solution' is a replica of the Bantustans under the South African apartheid regime. It seems to me that people will have to come around in the end to one good inclusive State, with a power-sharing constitutiom.
I'm the third generation of refugee hood, and i have nothing to loose except my soul, and i wish if i could've had another one in order to loose it again for my country "Palestine".
Israel is the creator of terorrism. Stop killing our children first, and let poor Palestinians have their right to live freely!