Haavara FAQs: Two NY Times advertisements by Zionists in the early 1943 that exposes Zionists' treason at the height of the calamity

It's stunning how two full-page advertisements in early 1943, can summarize Zionists' treason in one single scoop. As you contemplate these advertisements, please note that A) At the time, the mass majority of Zionists, Americans, and the British knew well that Palestine at the time couldn't handle more than a million (maybe two) at the most. That said, all knew it was impossible to send 5 million persecuted European Jews to Palestine. That's why it was an open secret that the future borders of the "Jewish state" must remain flexible even to this date, and most Zionists demanded Trans-Jordan too to be included in the future "Jewish state" B) These advertisements were published by Irgunists (a.k.a. the Bergson Group) at the height of calamity during the first half of 1943. That said, their agenda was completely changed in the 2nd half of the year as you shall see soon. During the 1st half of the year, Haim Greenberg (a renowned American Zionist leader) ridiculed their agenda and he predicted Europe's Jew would be annihilated when their army is ready to fight (see note 28 on Lenni Brenner's citation) . C) Most importantly, note how the advertisements focused only on Palestine when they knew well that Jews were facing not only multiple Nakbas (dispossession, ethnic cleansing, refugee camps, ..etc.) but a war of annihilation as early as of Sept. 1942. Thus, in practice, this evil policy left Europe's Jews with two options: either they do aliyah to Palestine or go to Auschwitz. D) This policy explains why the vast majority of Europe's Jews after the war ended, voted with their feet and immigrated to the Americas to live with the Gentiles. YES, this happened even after Palestinians were replaced and dispossessed during the war of Nakba. E) This insane policy continued even after WWII was concluded in the DP camps. Our analysis continues below images:

At NY Time

At NY Time

F) The second advertisement implied that Palestinians would have no problems in welcoming those Jewish refugees, which was a lie. All knew that Palestinians revolted just a few years earlier because they feared replacement and dispossession. OK, why those Zionists who paid for these expensive ads did not lobby for saving Jews in the US (where they lived) as they did for Palestine? Does this explain why Zionists lobbied to block any scheme that could've rescued Jews except for Palestine? G) Finally, please pay attention to those who signed on to the first advertisement below (leftmost column); the wall of shame. Just in case if you are curious, the Bergson Group kept of focusing on Palestine as the only haven for Jews between 1940 and mid-1943, and if you are interested in why and how they changed their minds, here are the boring details. Truth is much stranger than fiction; hang on to your seat; you will need a few seat belts.

In a nutshell, American Jewry and Zionist leaders executed David Ben-Gurion's infamous antisemitic hate speech to the maximum to increase their leverage, which he articulated a month after the Kristallnacht pogrom. We believe it is worthwhile watching Peter Bergson for two and half minutes talking about the Rabbis' March, the obstacles they faced from Zionists (which he referred to as "monkey wrenches"), how the Bergson Boys lobbied to rescue Europe's Jews in the US Congress, and most importantly how Zionists fought his group with tooth and nail because they didn't advocate saving Europe's Jews ONLY to Palestine. Make sure to watch Mr. Bergson to the last second and remember this happened when the last million and a half were alive: 

If the subject of American Jewry's response to the Holocaust interests you, please take a note that we have dedicated another section for this taboo topic. Anyhow, if you made it all the way here, and you still have the time and energy, we urge you to examine the Catastrophic Zionism phenomenon. But first, please fasten your seat belts.