Zionist FAQs: A Tale of Two Conflicts: Examining the Definition of Genocide
In a recent post on X, author and former diplomat Craig Murray highlighted a stark statistical difference between the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza. He pointed out that children account for just 0.3% of fatalities in Ukraine, while they represent 37.7% in Gaza. Murray concludes that this single statistic effectively illustrates "the difference between a war and a genocide":
13 pictures documenting the stages of starving Amal al-Biyouk, here are the details
This comparison gains further weight when considering the international response to each conflict. Russian President Vladimir Putin has been indicted as a war criminal for the killing and abduction of Ukrainian children. On average, under 700 Ukrainian children were killed in 4 years, while Israel kills as many per month in the 22-month war on Gazans. Furthermore, President Biden publicly labeled Putin's actions "genocidal" just two months after Russia's invasion of Ukraine began in February 2022. Sadly, so many Jews often accuse Palestinians and human rights activists of being "blood libel" when such a statistic is cited!
Here are a couple of chilling statistics that should drop your jaw to the floor: 1) The vast majority of the hospitals in the Gaza Strip were bombed by the Israelis more than once, and still to this date function at a fraction of their capacities. 2)Israel killed more journalists during the war in Gaza, more than the number of journalists killed during WWI, WWII, and the American Civil War combined, by at least fourfold (excluding the Jews who were murdered in the death camps). Now, make your best argument that Israel didn't hunt those journalists down! You would think the "liberal press" in the Western world (especially those at the NY Times or the Washington Post) had written an article or two to condemn such a blatant crime? Please, think twice! As we speak, we are witnessing the death of "liberalism" as we know it.
Pictures of Salwa: One week before she was starved to death & after
Shamelessly, so many Jews have been undermining civilian casualty reports coming from Gaza, and framing Gaza's genocide as the normal collateral damage that usually happens in wars of "self-defense." Lately, The Guardian and +972 Magazine examined the Israeli Army's own data, which conclusively proved that 83% of the dead were civilians (spoiler alert: the IDF didn't dispute the report). There you have it, once again, even the Israelis' own data proves that what is happening in Gaza is an active genocide. For months, Palestinian civilians were telling the whole world how they were being targeted at food aid centers, and they were ignored until Israeli soldiers confessed to being ordered to shoot at aid seekers. To deflect, Bibi Netanyahu accused the Israeli press and soldiers of "blood libel". As the former President, Bill Clinton, framed it: this is a war on defenseless civilians, and it has to simply stop:
The stark contrast in both the child fatality rates and the international legal and political reactions, as highlighted by these statistics and actions, raises a critical question about Western double standards. The argument is that if the loss of a smaller number of children in one conflict is deemed a basis for a war crimes indictment and a charge of genocide, then the proportionally much higher rate of child casualties in the other conflict should be viewed through a similar lens.
As you consider these figures and arguments, it is essential to keep in mind the scale of the conflict. The Gaza Strip is a tiny, densely populated area. only 40 kilometers long and, at its widest, 6 kilometers wide. Within this small territory, 2.2 million Palestinians were trapped. Since the conflict began, approximately 85% of this area has been designated as a "kill zone" by the Israeli army. The widespread destruction has reduced much of the strip to rubble, while Israeli authorities have severely restricted the entry of humanitarian aid.
Ezra Klain's Take On The Genocides
If you made this far and you still have doubts about our presentation, Ezra Klain (a "liberal" Zionist Jew of the NY Times) did an hour and half deep dive on this subject, and discussed the genocide from all side with Philippe Sands (a scholar on this subject, who happens to be an American Jew). Although this presentation was almost two years late, in our opinion, both did a fair job. Trust us, it will be worth your time:
Although Ezra never framed Gaza's atrocities as genocide, he came close several times to doing so, but he refrained (see his follow-up interview). On the other hand, when Mr. Sands framed the Oct. 7th Raid as a genocide, Mr. Klein didn't push back. Meaning, both Klain and Sands framed Oct. 7th as a genocide for the Jews! That said, it should be noted that most Jews (at least 60% in the case of American Jewry) are reluctant to consider anything other than the Holocaust to be a genocide, except for Oct. 7th. A notable example is the Armenian and Herero genocides, which were recognized by Israel only lately. As if to many Jews, if it is not exactly like the Holocaust, with people being shoved into the gas chambers, it is not actually a genocide, although the vast majority of Israeli Jews are openly bragging about the need to genocide Gazans!
Mr. Klain made it clear: if the Jews admitted the active genocide in Gaza, they would be doomed. Honestly, we don't know what to make of that. Time will tell if Ezra is correct. On the other hand, the major difference between what happened during WWII and the active genocide in Gaza is that the Nazis went out of their way to hide their crimes, but not for the Israeli Jewry.
Sam Harris' Take On The Genocide
Here is a professional takedown of Sam Harris' take on the Genocide. It should be noted that Sam's framing is the dominant one among American Jewry. But first, please hang on to your seat; you shall receive a high dose of Hasbarah as you have never seen before:
That is how and why most Jews live in their own bubbles; they live in a fictitious world of their own creation where Palestine and its people never existed, and it was the Jews who bloomed the desert. And when their bubbles are burst, they are quick to weaponize antisemitism. Lately, the more they do it, the more people hate them for it. YES, weaponizing antisemitism (at least in the case of Palestine) foments antisemitism.
The Hannibal Directive
Since most world Jewry framed Oct. 7th as a genocide for the Jews, just imagine if we discover anytime soon that the Hannibal Directive was implemented at much larger scale than we know of currently. If we discover such a plausible scenario to be factual, then that would make Israeli Jews complicit in two genocides, not just one! It should be noted that it is an open secret that the Hannibal Directive was implemented in several cases on Oct. 7th. Simply put, we don't know for sure how widely it was implemented on Oct. 7th; the jury is still out on this one. Only time will tell. We urge you to watch this short clip if you doubt our presentation:
Watch the next short clip and explain how hundreds of cars were charred when Hamas used mostly small firearms? You don't have to be a military expert to answer this question:
NINE MINUTES of lsraeIi testimonies proving they kiIIed their own people on October 7th.
Post Your Comment
*It should be NOTED that your email address won't be shared, and all communications between members will be routed via the website's mail server.