Zionist FAQs: Isn't it true that Palestinians don't want peace? Palestinians never accepted the two-state solution

Official UN Map: It was updated in August 1950 showing that Palestinians STILL OWN 94% of the lands

We shall prove soon that the word "peace" is the most abused word by Zionist Jews (especially by the American Jewish community) to the point that Palestinians' stomachs often turn when they hear it. To put it simply, the so-called "peace" Zionist Jews expect implies capitulation, replacement, and dispossession of the Palestinian people. The so-called "peace" (often associated with the so-called "Two-State Solution") that is being demanded by Zionist Jews effectively implies:

1. Legitimizing the outright theft of much of the Palestinians' land. Not only in the occupied West Bank but, most importantly, in Israel proper, where Palestinians still own much of the land. It's worth noting too that Palestinians still have their land deeds. On the other hand, we managed to spot only a few land deeds for the Jews who were citizens of Palestine!
2. The proposed map of the Palestinian state that was submitted by Ehud Barak during the failed Camp David summit in July 2000
   Legitimizing Israeli control over Palestinian lives from A to Z, where their movement is restricted by hundreds of roadblocks, water sources, electricity, population movement, and telecommunications are all controlled by the Zionist state (here is map illustration of what Ehud Barak submitted at failed Camp David summit). For the love of God, Palestinians in the West Bank still run 3G mobile service (not 4G or 5G),
3. To cancel their rights of return to their homes and reparations as enshrined in UN Resolution 194.
4. Legitimizing Israel's hegemony over Jerusalem, especially its holy sites and the old city!
5. Accepting over 160 exclusive Jewish colonies within the Palestinian state will hinder Palestinians' movements and future growth.
6. Demilitarizing the Palestinian "state"!
7. To exclude half of the Palestinian people who currently live outside Palestine as refugees in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and Egypt.
8. Therefore, that is not a sovereign "Two-State Solution." As it will be proven soon, it is more like a "1.05 State Solution." Everything about this so-called solution is grounded in gaslight and lies.

Get Off Our Land

Assuming Palestinians would accept such a farce of so-called "peace," then we might ask: why should Zionist Jews reject such a "peace" when and if Palestinians agree to their "generous" terms? The truth could be shocking to many Zionist Jews that Yasir Arafat (who was the ONLY person who could've sold such a crippled "peace" to Palestinians) almost accepted much of what Zionists demanded (inclusive of giving up the sacred right of return). Despite that, Israeli leaders couldn't make deals on their maximalist demands (which come naturally to Zionists), especially concerning the exclusive Jewish colonies in the West Bank and the holy sites in Jerusalem. In this regard, we urge you to watch the renowned Israeli journalist Gideon Levy making the case for how Israel NEVER had any critical mass that would accept the two-state solution and who opted to watch the cake and eat it at the same time:

Palestinian Refugees fleeing Jaffa in April or May 1948

Just in case you believe you are being gaslighted, here is a quick survey of Israelis who even deny the existence of the occupation. If you think about it, this is a logical conclusion once you convince yourself that Palestinians don't even exist (a myth that is widely spread among American Jews). Watch: What occupation? The Arabs occupy Jewish lands (even Google hides the occupied territories when Hebrew is used for search; yes, Big Tech radicalized & brainwashed Israel's Gen Zs), and the Jewish people need to expand their version of Lebensraum into Jordan! Here, you will find another video for Mr. Levy explaining how comfortable Israelis have become with their fascist state; birds of a feather flock together. If you have the time, we urge you to watch Israel's UK Ambassador and Daniel Levy (one of the founders of the Geneva Accords) articulating what we have concluded, and as you watch, please pay attention to how Daniel implied that what Arafat accepted was "a big deal" (shrinking Palestine to 22%) and how Israeli leaders kept pushing for more and more concessions (which he called it "YES" +++). That said, what we wrote is an open secret in Israel, and anyone who's visited Israel will assure you that these points of view are the norm and fertile not only in the far-right but amongst the dominant Israeli mainstream too (assuming the Israeli left ever existed which is shrinking by the day).

To know what Palestinians think, we ask you to watch Ghassan Kanafani (one of the most famous Palestinian writers) for 90 seconds only, describing how such a "peace" is being understood by the average Palestinian. Sadly, shortly after taping this interview, Israelis assassinated Ghassan along with his niece in the early 1970s:

Just Imagine someone sitting in your chair for over seven decades. Again, imagine this person was sitting in your house and eating from your trees!

YES, ladies and gentlemen. The "peace" that Zionist Jews demand that Palestinians accept is the same one that is being demanded by the sword from the neck. This is one of the BEST EXAMPLES of how Jews (now it is safe to conflate Jews with Zionism since most Jews are Zionists; but not so during the pre-Nakba period) abuse the English language. Peace, one of the most noble words, has been hijacked to sell Palestinians Jim Crow, land theft, genocides, ethnic cleansing, and replacing the indigenous people. Dear Jews: Mazeltov on your Hasbarah, no freeman will accept enslavement in the name of "peace"! Therefore, we suggest abusing another term, i.e., the "indigenous Jewish people"!

Let's Examine The DNA Genetic Distances between Israelites, European Jews, Arab Jews, and Palestinian

The astute reader will ask: If Israelis never had the critical mass to accept the two-state solution, and as it has been made clear here, no Palestinian would accept (especially after Arafat was poisoned) the two-state solution as well, then who is pushing for it? We've concluded that the two-state solution isn't demanded by either Israelis or Palestinians. To put it bluntly, the so-called two-state solution is being demanded and pushed by successive American (especially among the American Jewish community) and EU Administrations. But why?

• Fake Valor: Why did two of Israel's future PMs, Menachem Begin and Yizhak Shamir, bomb WWII war efforts while their families were being gassed in Poland?
  The West (especially in Europe) increasingly feels that supporting Israel is no longer an asset (that is, if it ever was). On the contrary, many in the West feel that supporting Israel has become a liability. This is very clear in most polls showing how the younger generation is tired of providing unconditional support to Israel (see NY Times' The Daily, starting from 13:00). As we have seen after the Oct. 7th Raid, easily the West could be dragged into the Middle East to fight Israeli wars again. No US president is ready to do it, YES, again. After the withdrawal from both Afghanistan and Iraq, no American wants to go back to the Middle East.
• Hitler's Message To The West: If Jews are such noble citizens and you care about them, how come you're not letting them in?
  American Jews (who mostly became a Zionist community after the 6-Day War, but not before) concluded that Israel is on an unsustainable path. The two-state solution is being demanded to preserve Jews as the majority and to preserve Israeli "democracy" (as if reducing the indigenous majority to a minority is a "democracy" by any definition). In this regard, American Jews are way more Zionist than Israeli Jews! And deeply ethical issues such as apartheid, crippled democracy, and usurpation of Palestinian lands are way too secondary (if any!). It is worth noting that the majority of American Jews (but not all; there is a vocal anti-Zionist minority) approve of how the "Jewish state" was created, and replacing and dispossessing Palestinians (during the War of Nakba) was never an issue. That is why the vast majority of Zionist American Jews vigorously denied Nakba! Recognizing Nakba not only legitimizes Palestinian resistance but also delegitimizes Israel. Once the debate shifts to Nakba, ethnic cleansing, and Palestinian dispossession out of their homes, lands, and businesses, honestly, they have no leg to stand on. That is how fragile the Zionist argument is. That is why Zionist Jews are often quick to weaponize antisemitism to shut down the discussion (a kind of mental terror). If you want to know more about this, we urge you to hear this NY Times podcast that articulated this point.
  
  
  Browse hundreds of pictures showing Zionist Jews looting Palestinian properties
  That said, it should be emphasized that American Jewry can immigrate to Israel to solve its so-called demographic problem, and Israel will be a Jewish majority for the foreseeable future (something similar to the Haavara Agreement that was stuck between Hitler and Ben-Gurion in the 1930s but at many favorable terms). On the other hand, they favor continuing to live with the Gentiles. However, every other American Jew visited Israel at least once, and only a small portion made Israel a home (usually done by retirees who kept a foot in the US and another overseas). This point creates lots of friction among Israeli Jews who feel they are being sacrificed for a fragile idea. At the same time, their American brothers continue to live in relative safety and luxury (with emphasis on safety, which is the primary purpose they support Israel).
• Were the British so STUPID as to promise COMPLETE INDEPENDENCE to Palestinians in 1939 (who, of course, "didn't exists") while the Indians had been DREAMING of such a thing for 400 years?
  It is strongly suspected that the American Jewish community (both Zionists and anti-Zionists alike) has concluded that they are on an unsustainable path as well. Defending Israel requires them to repeat ridiculous lies (many of which Israelis abandoned decades ago; here is one of the best proof), and that inadvertently started to foment "antisemitism" against themselves in the West.YES, supporting Israel started to ricochet back on American Jews who often intentionally conflate anti-Zionism with "antisemitism" in defense of Israel (a dangerous phenomenon that evolved recently in 2016), which is a farce argument on many levels (NY Times for the first time addressed this dangerous Zionist weapon when applied against young American Jews)! Love it or hate it: Palestinians are not expected to approve of their replacement and dispossession so American Jews can approve of them!
  
  
  Which hate speech was worse: Hitler's hate speech at the Reichstag on Jan 30th, 1939, or Ben-Gurion's speech (just two months before Hitler's speech) when he incited the murder of German Jews a month after the Kristallnacht pogrom?
• What has been tragically sad is that American Jews and their leaders knew well for seven decades that conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism (and conflating Judaism with the "Jewish state") is very dangerous which could risk fomenting antisemitism (see how Abraham Gurman describes the dual loyalty problem, his characterization is second to none). This is an open secret, which explains why they delayed weaponizing antisemitism by almost seven decades (watch Geoffrey Levin articulating our point for the next 10 to 12 minutes starting from 6:00). Therefore, American Jews and their Jewish leaders didn't just sleepwalk into this; YES they could be arrogant, but they are not ignorant; they knew well of the risks of becoming Zionists' useful idiot. This fact has a dangerous implication, as it has been articulated by Abraham Gutman in 2021:
  Adolf Eichmann & company coined a special Gold Medallion in honor of the Nazis' relationship with Zionists! Do you've any ideas why he visited Palestine in 1937?

  It is this conflation between Israel and Judaism, one that is baked into the foundation of Israel and perpetuated by its leaders, that leads to a problematic tautology: Israel’s leaders represent all Jewish people, and thus by definition any criticism of Israel must be criticism of all Jewish people — and hence antisemitic.
  
  This tautology allows accusations of antisemitism to be weaponized, particularly against people who speak up about Palestinian rights -- sometimes in ridiculous ways. (Supporting Palestinian rights is antisemitic because Israel wants it to be by Abraham Gutman)

  That said, we are forced to conclude that the American Jewish community and its leaders are either desperate to protect Israel, plain stupid, reckless, don't care about their community, or a combination of all the above! Sadly, the last option seems to be the most plausible answer. It should be emphasized that German Jews looked at Zionists as the enemy from within exactly because of this issue; they knew well how dangerous Zionism was; they knew Zionists would foment antisemitism (for political gains) where it doesn't exist! That is why the mass majority of Europe's Jews voted with their feet to live with the Gentiles in the Americas, although Palestine was emptied of its people. As we were investigating the Haavara Agreement, we were shocked to discover that American Jews did something similar during WWII and at the height of the calamity; here are the boring details.

• Browse hundreds of pictures showing Israeli destruction of Palestinian homes
  Also, we've found that there is a kind of ongoing civil war among the American Jewish community; it is a kind of generational divide where the new generation is not willing to repeat the big lies their parents have been repeating for decades. That is another reason why so many American Jews are in a hurry to push for the so-called "two-state solution." However, they know Israelis and Palestinians walked away from this so-called "solution" decades ago. American Jews started to see their community on the verge of imploding, and they hoped such a fake "peace" could save them. We urge you to read this article in the NY Times articulating our conclusion. This is all over TikTok as well.

David Ben-Gurion: we're the aggressors; Arabs defend themselves. (Righteous Victims, p. 652)

Here is the unvarnished truth: Palestinians in mass have concluded that the so-called two-state solution is nothing but a placebo (more like a mirage or an alibi); everything about it is based on lies, gaslights, and deceptions. Please watch Fawaz Gerges and the former US president Bill Clinton articulating our point within 200 seconds. If you have the time, please hear Prof. Rashid Khalidi articulating our points of view to FP (start from 8:00). For God's sake, what is the number "two" representing? Why not 1.05, 1.07854, or 1.1? What is the "state"? What is the "solution" for? Palestinians talk about their looted lands, homes, and businesses, and Zionist Jews and their Western supporters are talking about a "Palestinian state" with no defined borders, sovereignty, population, or even control over its water sources, electricity, and telecommunications. This is a classic example of Western propaganda proving how the most noble of words ( in this case, "peace") is being hijacked and misused!

A Playlist Of Short Clips Of Jews Sharing Their DNA Test Results

On top of that, Israelis never had the critical mass to accept such a generous "1.05-State Solution"! If you think about it, the proposed "Two-State Solution" is exactly what Ze'ev Jabotinsky called the Iron Wall in the early 1920s, and as we have seen, this wall came down crashing on Oct. 7th; Jabotinsky's Iron Wall theory was proven to be an illusion. Therefore, Mr. Kanafani was accurate: there could never be a negotiation between the sword and the neck! It is unfair and unjust to even ask such a thing of the persecuted! As if Palestinians are being asked to capitulate and surrender, that is a pipe dream. Let us be honest: the Israelis never wanted this so-called two-state solution for sure, and Palestinians didn't want it, especially after Arafat was poisoned, and the West put it into a deep freeze in the past two decades, then after Oct. 7th, they wanted to resurrect their dead so-called "solution," which they murdered! Good luck selling resurrection to Palestinian Muslims or Christians (much of whom founded Arab nationalism and resistance to colonialism)!

Palestinian women harvesting cotton in the village of Kafr Saba in 1937

Let us put lipstick on this "peaceful" pig to see where this "discussion" is going: Palestinians should negotiate about what? About what "peace"? And, to stop fighting for "what"? That's why discussing this topic is very frustrating even for the most "moderate" of Palestinians, especially after 30 years of implementing the Oslo Accords that turned those so-called moderates into an extension arm of the Israeli occupation (more like Vichy-like government in France during the Nazi occupation). This point was articulated by Mahmoud Dahlan in Arabic, who is well known to be the MOST anti-Hamas Palestinian.

It should be noted that Hamas agreed to the two-state solution in 2017 but without recognizing the statehood of Israel. Such an interim deal could be sold to Palestinians as long as they don't forfeit Palestinian rights. We were surprised to find that some Israelis accept such a scheme without referring to Hamas' 2017 offer. Simply, Israel can withdraw from the West Bank as it did in Gaza in 2005, with or without an agreement!

Fake Valor: Why Did Zionist Jews Hoist Nazis Flag on Their Ships in the 1930s?

It is possible that Palestinians and Israelis are not yet ready for a final peace settlement. However, that is no excuse for accepting any interim "peace agreement" that compromises critical Palestinian national interests. Until a fair and just peace agreement that addresses the core issues is reached, both communities have to start educating themselves about the conflict and hope for the best.

Related Links

• Why did Arafat reject Barak's "generous" offer at Camp David?
• Video: Two-State Solution Debate | Gideon Levy | Proposition  Duration: 12 min 37 sec (A MUST WATCH)
• Video: Asking Israelis: Why can't you admit there is an occupation? (20 minutes) (A MUST WATCH)
• Video: Israel's fears, its delusions, and its future | Daniel Levy | The Big Picture (60 minutes) (A MUST WATCH)
• Short Clip: Fawaz Gerges: Hamas now speaks for Palestinians (140 seconds) (A MUST WATCH)
• Short Clip: A Jewish historian (Barnaby Raine) explains how the two-state solution is ‘an alibi’ and not a real solution!  Duration: min 16 sec
• Why journalists are speaking out against Western media bias in reporting on Israel-Palestine 
• Short Clip: A young American Jew who had it with Israeli lies and their hate of Arabs. Make sure not to skip the last few seconds. Duration: min 47 sec
• Video: John Mearsheimer on the "Two-State Solution"
• Foreign Policy Podcast: Why historian Rashid Khalidi gives the White House a failing grade. (52 minutes) (a must hear)
• The RAND: Israelis Unwilling to Risk Two-State Solution; Palestinians Only Interested in Variant That Israelis Cannot Accept A 2021 Analysis by the RAND that pre-dates the Oct. 7th Raid!
• NYTimes The Daily: Biden Supports Israel. Does the Rest of America? (28 minutes) The relevant portion starts from 13:00
• 12 Conventional Lies By Uri Avnery
• Frequently Asked Questions Regarding The Camp David Peace Proposal by The Washington Report
• NY Times Podcast: The Best Primer I’ve Heard on Israeli-Palestinian Peace Efforts (64 minutes)
• Zionist FAQs: Why Anti-Zionist Is Not Antisemitism?
• Buying Palestinian National Rights
• Short Clip: Former prime minister of Israel, Ehud Barak, says Netanyahu bolstered Hamas to avoid the threat of a 2-state solution.
• Listen to an interview with the former Israeli Foreign Minister (Shlomo Ben-Ami) admitting that Palestinians were correct to reject the Israeli and American "proposed" settlement for the conflict at Camp David in 2000 (starting from minute 49:20).
• Was Barak's offer generous or not that's the question. A slide flash show prepared by Gush-Shalom
• What Barak finally offered in Taba, 2001
• What Daily Start: Israeli settlements provide a road map to failure By Jimmy Carter
• Ha'aretz Daily: B'Tselem report: settlers control 41.9% of West Bank
• Zionist FAQ: Why Palestinians Teach Their Children to Hate Jews?
• Zionist FAQ: How could Palestinians send their kids to riot against Israeli soldiers?