
JNF's Canada Park. Built on the ethnically cleansed and destroyed villages of 'Imwas, Yalu, and Bayt Nuba
Up until a year and a half ago, the vast majority of visitors to Canada Park,
one of the most popular hiking and picnic sites on the way to Jerusalem, had no
idea that the park was built on the ruins of three Palestinian villages whose
inhabitants were forced to leave in the wake of the Six-Day War. It was only
after the Keren Kayemet LeIsrael-Jewish National Fund agreed to the demands of
the Zochrot non-governmental organization and posted signs in the park about two
villages, Yalu and Emmaus,
that their existence first became known to hikers. But since their posting,
someone has already made sure to tear down one of the signs and vandalize the
other.
But the members of the NGO have not given up. The director of Zochrot, Eitan
Bronstein, recently turned to the JNF
and asked its director to examine the possibility of posting signs to mark
abandoned Palestinian villages at all the sites it administers. The NGO offered
its professional help in locating the remains of the villages and finding
important details about life in them.
The JNF did not reject the request out of hand. Its administration held a
discussion last month on the matter and issued the following response to
Bronstein: "For the purpose of concentrated handling of the subject, the
JNF administration would like to receive information from you about the
additional sites where, in the opinion of the NGO, there is room to mark the
Palestinian communities that existed until 1948. The JNF has research tools for
examining the subject, and therefore we are asking at this stage only to receive
the list of the relevant sites."
As far as Zochrot is concerned, marking the location of Palestinian communities
that were destroyed in 1948 is part of the effort to make Israel recognize its
responsibility for the Nakba ("The Catastrophe"; the Palestinians'
term for the 1948 war), and for the right of the refugees to return to their
villages. This goal is unacceptable to most Israelis. But providing information
about these villages also contributes to knowledge of the country's history and
culture, and to greater awareness of the factors that have shaped the Israeli
landscape. This has taken on added importance mainly in light of recent efforts
byplanners and environmental protection groups to preserve "cultural
landscapes" - in other words, areas whose landscape was shaped by human
activity.
What may appear to hikers as a product of nature is usually a landscape that has
undergone human adaptation that began thousands of years ago and ended with the
Palestinian villages. The terraces (graduated steps on the hillside used for
farming), the orchards, the aqueducts and various aspects of the landscape were
shaped and plowed by farmers through generations. This is especially apparent in
the Jerusalem hills, the shfela
(Judean lowlands) and the Galilee.
Hundreds of agricultural structures that once served a magnificent and
successful network of irrigation in the Palestinian village of Ein Kerem can
still be found around Ein Kerem, now a Jerusalem neighborhood. On the hills of Beit
Nataf adjacent to Beit Shemesh, an area which the Israel Nature and National
Parks Protection Authority (INNPA) wants to turn into a national park, the
orchards of the Palestinian village that once stood there continue to shape the
landscape.
Historians who are very critical of the Zionist movement, such as Dr.
Ilan Pappe, claim that disregarding the existence of Palestinian villages is
part of a deliberate effort to erase their history in favor of creating a new
one that suits the Zionist narrative of a country that was barren, and only
flourished thanks to groups like the JNF. In a study he published, Pappe
analyzes the information that JNF provides on several sites, including the Biria
Forest, the Jerusalem Forest, the area of Ramat Menashe and the Sataf
site near Jerusalem. "The Palestinian orchards are presented as a product
of nature, and the history of Palestine is relocated to the period of the Bible
and the Talmud," he writes in his discussion of the site of the village of Ein
Zeitun in the Biria Forest.
Pappe also points out that the JNF publishes information about unique sites in
the Jerusalem Forest and Sataf that
testify to the extensive agricultural activity in the region. The information
emphasizes the presence of terraces, describing them as ancient, even if they
were built and maintained by Palestinian villages.
A recent study conducted by Noga Kadman (as part of her studies in the
Department of Peace and Development Research at Goteborg University in Sweden,
under the tutelage of Prof. Oren Yiftachel of Ben-Gurion University of the
Negev), found about 86 Palestinian villages inside the JNF forests - sites she
describes as "emptied." Most of the sites have directional signs, but
only 15 percent of them mention the villages by their Arab name. Most of the
pamphlets and brochures do not even mention the villages. And in half of the
literature where the villages are mentioned, the fact that their inhabitants
were Arabs is elided. Only in one case did it say how many people lived in the
village, and only in isolated instances is there any discussion of the lives of
the inhabitants.
"In most cases, the fact that the villages ceased to exist is not
specifically mentioned," writes Kadman. "This can be concluded from
the text regarding most of the villages, which are called 'abandoned,' and are
described as ruins or remains, or mentioned in the past tense."
Bronstein has already submitted Kadman's list of villages to the JNF. He also
intends to approach INNPA and ask that it, too, mention the location of
abandoned villages in nature reserves and national parks. The INNPA said in
response that no site is given preference or ignored because of national or
religious affiliation, and that there are several Palestinian villages that are
mentioned in signs and in the informational material prepared by the authority.
Yehuda Ziv, who heads the Government Names Committee's subcommittee for
community names, and is considered one of the leading experts in Israel in the
field, supports the idea of marking the location of abandoned Arab villages.
"I support the mention of the Arab names of various sites, including
villages, streams and other places, and I think that they should not have been
erased from the map," says Ziv. "One reason is that these names often
teach us about the country's Jewish past. There is an additional reason, and
that is the fact that these names teach us the history of the country and its
landscape. I claimed that original Arab names of existing communities should be
added as part of a first map of Israel in Arabic being prepared by the Israel
Mapping Center, but I was told that there is no room for that. However,
regarding destroyed villages, I think that we should make do simply with a
mention of the name of the village."
Click here to see this article at Ha'aretz's website.
Post Your Comment
*It should be NOTED that your email address won't be shared, and all communications between members will be routed via the website's mail server.