Haavara FAQs: How does David Ben-Gurion's infamous antisemitic hate speech --inciting the murder of German Jewish children a month after the Kristallnacht pogrom-- compare to Chaim Rumkowski's chilling "Give me your children" speech during WWII in the Lodz Ghetto?

The key difference between Chaim Rumkowski and David Ben-Gurion was a narrow stroke of luck: Erwin Rommel did not advance the few hundred miles further to Palestine, determining how both would meet their end. Strikingly, in the so-called "Land of Kapos," those considered "free and brave," like Hannah Arendt, faced boycotts, while Kapos moved unimpeded. Indeed, the land that declined to boycott the Nazis chose instead to boycott Ms. Arendt. Scroll down for further evidence:

Here is another counterfactual to contemplate: how Ben-Gurion's infamous antisemitic hate speech (a month after Kristallnacht) was not much worse than Hitler's at the Reichstag 45 days later on Jan. 30th, 1939? Here is a fun fact: Ben-Gurion never retracted his hate speech and Jews NEVER condemned his blatant antisemitism to this date!

Here is another counterfactual contemplate: what if King Chaim Rumkowski wasn't killed in Auschwitz by the Jews he sent there, and he made it to Israel like many other Kapos after WWII ended, do you have any doubts that he would have walked free? Why not? Wasn't the Israeli government who sued for libel those who described Mr. Kastner as  Kapo? Imagine if King Chaim was killed (sorry murdered) in Israel rather than in Auschwitz, those would-be "murderers would have been tried for murder in the Land of Kapos? Does that explain why most Kapos walked free and those who exposed them were prosecuted by the state? Does this explain why the Zionists gave the antisemites who persecuted them in Europe a free pass three years after WWII ended? How that doesn't explain why Zionists use Palestinians as alibis?