Haavara FAQs: Winston Churchill and antisemitism, a collection of articles written by Churchill in the 1920s and 30s

Winston Churchill wrote the below article in September 1937, where he BLAMED German Jews for their plight (meaning German Jews brought it upon themselves). Note how the article was SELF CENSORED for seven decades in the so-called mainstream "liberal press" and how Churchill's biographers (i.e., Sir. Martin Gilbert) purposely conflated Judaism with Zionism to deflect away Churchill's antisemitism (which is a common Zionist trick as it will be proven below shortly), although it was Churchill himself who went out of his way not to lump all Jews with Zionists! That said, based on our extensive research on the subject of the Haavara Agreement, we found ZERO evidence that German Jews did anything remotely disloyal to their country. Until now, we are honestly baffled how and why Germans turned on a dime so quickly against a tiny loyal group of citizens (the vast majority of them were already assimilated and many already converted)! On the contrary, we found nothing but loyal citizens who even complied with Germany's racist laws and lobbied against boycotting German products. That said, we cannot say the same about the Jews currently living in the West, especially for those in the United States. Sadly, lying in defense of Israel is endemic and at an industrial scale in the American Jewish community. Initially, when we started doing our research on this subject, we expected German Jewry to have behaved exactly like the American Jewish community (please watch Prof. Alan Dershowitz articulating our point in under seventy seconds). Much to our surprise, German Jewry had the exact opposite profile of their American counterpart! Our critical analysis continues below the articles:


The below screenshot (from the British Independent newspaper) cited a couple of important examples exposing Churchill's antisemitism in the 1920s and 30s. Pay attention to A) how fond Churchill was of Hitler's accomplishments as late as 1937. YES, that was two years before WWII (keep in mind he had a few negative things to say). It is well known that Mr. Churchill have praised every fascist leader you could imagine, such as Benito Mussolini (a.k.a. Il Douche), Franco of Spain, and Salazar of Portugal beside Hitler of course. At the time, the West felt the threat was coming from the Soviet Union, and not from fascism. B) The IMPORTANT part is at the end of the article. As we have seen earlier in the NY Times' article, Zionist so-called historians (in this case, it was Sir Martin Gilbert, a renowned Zionist apologist) are used to CLEANSE someone's antisemitism by purposely conflating Zionism with Judaism (i.e., by citing someone's pro-Zionist policies, therefore, he or she are good to Jews); thus, the useful antisemites are given a clean bill of health (Trump has been exploiting this tactic to the maximum). This deflection tactic was extremely useful to Nazis and Fascists alike before and after WWII when the Jewish Agency was used during the denazification process. Click here for the boring details if you are interested. C) Also note how Churchill (as the father of antisemitism Hitler) was smart enough not to conflate Judaism with Zionism, as it will become apparent in the screenshot that follows this one:

Here, we cite a section of Churchill's infamous antisemitic article (Zionism versus Bolshevism), which he wrote in the early 1920s. When you read the article, you will see how Churchill went out of his way not to conflate Zionism with Judaism. Actually, in his article, Churchill separated Jews into five different categories, and as you see below, Churchill was fond of the Zionist category; Nazis shared a similar feeling as well! Ironically, around the same time Adolf Hitler (the father of antisemitism) wrote something similar about Zionists in Mein Kampf; Adolf, too, refused to conflate:

As you contemplate the following characterization of Jews PLEASE KEEP IN MIND that Churchill wrote this article exactly when Adolf Hitler published Mein Kampf. The readers might find it interesting that Adolf Hitler shared similar views almost around the same time (1923-24). It was stunning to read that both nearly used the same terminology. Also notice that since it was Mr. Churchill who severely criticized the Munich Agreement with Hitler in Oct. 1938 (which was popular in England when it was signed), this implies that his views on Hitler were reversed way late in the game.

In their defense, Churchill and Hitler were both products of their Westerner colonial time, where racism, colonialism, segregation, Jim, Crow, and antisemitism were way more widespread than the media portrays it to be. Based on our research, what Wikipedia disclosed here is ONLY the tip of the iceberg. Therefore, let us not be too harsh on Hitler; colonialism, Jim Crow, ethnic cleansing, genocides, land theft, ..etc were all normalized at that time, and the West portrays Hitler as the embodiment of evil just because he gave Westerners a small dose of their medicine. Keep in mind that the genocides in the Congo and Namibia were ongoing around the same time when between 10 to 20 million indigenous Africans perished; and those were only a drop in the bucket. In the media, Hitler is being portrayed as evil just because he did evil in Europe. Let us be honest: if Hitler's evil acts were done in the global south (as Germany did in its African colonies like in Namibia), only a few would have been bothered:

...Analysis Continues

We were shocked to discover that the German Jewish community had the opposite profile of the American Jewish community. We found ZERO evidence that the German Jewish community had a dual loyalty problem, and we found that they went out of their way to put German interests first. In our opinion, American Jewry is playing with fire; they are not just sleepwalking into danger. For decades, they knew well the risks of conflating Judaism with Zionism and how it would create the dreaded dual loyalty impression they feared, and they may have crossed the point of no return. Therefore, if Churchill (who was a pro-Zionist almost from day one) made such accusations based on unfounded rumors as late as Sept 1937, then who can guarantee that future American politicians wouldn't exploit the truth for political gains? We have seen how quickly Germans turned on a tiny loyal Jewish community, and there is no reason to believe that something similar wouldn't happen in the US. American Jewry are in a self-reinforcing viscous circle, to defend Israel they are fomenting antisemitism (knowingly or unknowingly, exactly as Zionists did in the 1930s) which eventually will catch up with them sooner or later. They knew well the cost of conflating Judaism with Zionism.

As you contemplate Churchill's earlier clear antisemitic remarks (that spanned forty years of his life), we are forced to ask:
Can you honestly name a SINGLE European antisemite who wasn't a pro-Zionist?
Can you name a SINGLE European antisemite whom Zionists didn't work with hand over fist?
Isn't it wrong, reckless, and dangerous when Jews conflate Zionism with Judaism?
Why do Zionist Jews expect others to conflate Judaism with Zionism when antisemites (i.e., Churchill and Hitler) did the precise opposite?