PalestineRemembered About Us Oral History العربية
Menu Pictures Zionist FAQs Haavara Maps
PalestineRemembered.com Satellite View Search Donate Contact Us Looting 101 العربية
About Us Zionist FAQs Conflict 101 Pictures Maps Oral History Haavara Facts Not Lies Zionism 101 Zionist Quotes

Zionist FAQs: Why Anti-Zionist Is Not Antisemitism?

Official UN Map: Which was updated in August 1950, showing that Palestinians STILL OWN 94% of the lands

The Conflation of Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism: A Critical Examination

For political and economic motives, powerful Western groups have recently begun to equate anti-Zionism with antisemitism, ostensibly to defend Israel's "right to exist." This dangerous conflation must be analyzed from three distinct perspectives: the Palestinian, the Zionist leadership, and the Nazi points of view. Understanding these angles reveals the profound risks of equating anti-Zionism with antisemitism (and Judaism with Zionism) for Palestinians, Jews, and global humanity. The arguments presented here are heavily sourced from Israeli, Zionist, and Jewish materials, with all relevant facts and data directly linked for verification.

Defining Antisemitism

Before proceeding, let's define antisemitism. In simple terms, antisemitism is the strategic weaponization of hatred against Jews to achieve political, propaganda, or economic goals. This weaponization can be employed by Jews and non-Jews alike, often leading to severe consequences.

The Palestinian Perspective: Anti-Zionism is Not Antisemitism

Weaponizing Antisemitism in defense of Israel By Donna Level Weaponizing Antisemitism in Defense of Israel By Donna Level

From a Palestinian viewpoint, the expectation that they should "approve" of those who dispossessed and ethnically cleansed them from their ancestral land --an expectation championed by the "civilized and liberal" West, which has a historical legacy of Jim Crow, apartheid, fascism, and antisemitism itself-- is illogical and insulting. Any resistance to being replaced and dispossessed is met with the weaponization of "antisemitism." No free person can accept such an injustice, regardless of Western media campaigns.

It is crucial to note that Palestinians still hold the majority of land ownership and possess the corresponding land deeds, while a few deeds belonging to Jewish citizens of Palestine have been presented. This fact alone challenges the narrative of who is squattering on Palestinian land.

American Indian Freedom Dance With a Palestinian
Get Off Our Land

Israeli leaders, past and present, have historically understood that Palestinians and Arabs would never willingly accept Zionism (Israel’s "right to exist"). Any acceptance is often achieved only through duress, aligning with Ze'ev Jabotinsky's infamous "Iron Wall" Doctrine. The persistence of this demand is therefore either a Zionist propaganda tactic --designed to portray Palestinians as "against peace" and negate any need for Israeli concessions-- or a display of profound contempt for Palestinians.

To grasp the Palestinian perspective, the insights of renowned Israeli historian and proud Iraqi Jew, Avi Shlaim, are invaluable. We urge you to watch him for 80 seconds:

Shlaim highlights that antisemitic materials found in the Arab world during the pre-Nakba period were all imports from Europe. They were not "indigenous" to the region. He traced the introduction and translation of this antisemitic literature to the post-Balfour Declaration era, specifically the 1920s:

In essence, antisemitism is a European export, and it was Zionists who introduced it to a region where it previously held little ground. Consequently, the Palestinian hatred for those who replaced and dispossessed them is justified. Furthermore, when we examined the historical record, particularly the Haavara Agreement, we discovered that the fomenting of antisemitism has been an inherent characteristic of Zionism. As an interesting aside, Google's AI, Gemini, noted an added twist to Shlaim's arguments: the imported antisemitic material was translated from Europe not by Muslims, but by Christian Arab nationalists.

Anti-Zionism is antisemitism from the Zionist leaders' points of view

Browse hundreds of pictures depicting Palestinian culture & folklore

Since effectively Zionist Jews are asking Palestinians to be Zionists (meaning to accept Israel's right to exist on stolen Palestinian land where Jews are the majority), let's ask the founder of the "Jewish state," David Ben-Gurion: Could Palestinians or Arabs ever become Zionists? Let's see what David had to say about this in 1938:

"Almost every [Palestinian] Arab" opposed Zionism, "because he is an Arab, because he is a Muslim, because he dislikes foreigners, and because we are hateful to him in every way." The conflict had lasted thirty years, and was liable "to continue for perhaps hundreds more." This was a "real war, a war of life or death." (Shabtai Teveth, p. 184)
Weaponizing Antisemitism in defense of Israel By Donna Level David Ben-Gurion: We're the aggressors; Arabs defend themselves. (Righteous Victims, p. 652)

Also, consider how David Ben-Gurion implied that it was the Zionists who were the aggressors, at least from the political point of view. He admitted that Palestinians have the right to defend their lands (just imagine an American or Israeli politician saying that), which is now considered "antisemitism" or a "genocide" by most Zionist Jews. He stated in the context of the First Palestinian Intifada in 1938:

"When we say that the Arabs are the aggressors and we defend ourselves ---- that is only half the truth. As regards our security and life we defend ourselves. . . . But the fighting is only one aspect of the conflict, which is in its essence a political one. And politically, we are the aggressors and they defend themselves." (Righteous Victims, p. 652)

[As you contemplate the earlier citation, keep in mind that 58% of Americans believe that it is OK for Palestinians and their supporters to question the legitimacy of the existence of the "Jewish state". Therefore, based on the current Zionist narrative, we can conclude that three out of every five Americans are )))antisemitic(((! ]
Hitler's Message To The West: If Jews are such noble citizens and you care about them, how come you're not letting them in?

It is worth noting what David Ben-Gurion told Nahum Goldmann (one of the founders of the "Jewish state") before he died:

"I don't understand your optimism," Ben-Gurion declared. "Why should the Arabs make peace? If I was an Arab leader I would never make terms with Israel. That is natural: we have taken their country. Sure, God promised it to us, but what does that matter to them? Our God is not theirs. We come from Israel, it's true, but two thousand years ago, and what is that to them? There has been anti-Semitism from the Nazis, Hitler, and Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They only see one thing: we have come here and stolen their country. Why should they accept that? They may perhaps forget in one or two generations' time, but for the moment, there is no chance. So it's simple: we have to stay strong and maintain a powerful army. Our whole policy is there. Otherwise, the Arabs will wipe us out".
"But how can you sleep with that prospect in mind," I broke in, "and be Prime Minister of Israel too?"
Who says I sleep? he answered simply. (The Jewish Paradox by Nahum Goldmann, p. 99)

We urge you to watch Bassem Youssef articulating the earlier Israeli leaders' quotes within 90 seconds or less:

Which hate speech was worse: Hitler's hate speech at the Reichstag on Jan 30th, 1939, or Ben-Gurion's speech (just two months before Hitler's speech) when he incited the murder of German Jews a month after the Kristallnacht pogrom?

If you think what Ben-Gurion articulated wasn't expressive of Zionist leaders in the past and recent present, think twice. That said, nowadays, it is very frustrating to have any reasonable conversation with Zionist Jews, especially with the so-called liberals in the American Jewish community. Their version(s) of Israel is completely detached from reality, and when their farce arguments are exposed, they are quick to weaponize antisemitism against you. If you have a minute, please listen to Emily Tamkin (starting from 15:12 to 15:43) describing how "...American Jews have created a version of Israel that is divorced from what is happening on the ground".

JTA Sept. 3rd, 1933 Quoting Nahum Sokolow: "Hitlerism enables us to convert all Jews to Zionism."

As Emily cited, many other American Jews made similar observations; here is Seth Rogen's version. If you have the time, we urge you to review this proof first; it will prove to you how American Jews have intentionally infected themselves with "believable" lies. If you have more time, we ask you to watch Miko Peled exposing you to how Israeli Jews are being indoctrinated with Zionist big lies in the Israeli school system and army boot camps. Therefore, Emily's earlier characterization wasn't concocted out of the blue. Sadly, this is an open secret and widely debated in Jewish communities around the world, but the mainstream media in the West have been masking it for decades. In other words, there is no market for the truth; there is a market for the big lies.

Hungury's Jewry stampeding for the coveted immigration certificates, Spring 1944

Here is a thought experiment: Assume we are living in Budapest, Hungary, between March and June 1944, and the gate of hell opened up, and only those with immigration certificate visas to Palestine could be saved: Do you honestly think the Zionist leadership handed those coveted immigration certificates to Jews irrespective of their ideological and party affiliations? What if we tell you this hypothetical scenario already happened eight decades ago during WWII? Spoiler Alert: We are not only referring to the infamous Kastner's Train; there was a far more sinister one. This cruel selection criterion was embedded in the Zionist project since its inception. Here are the boring details. Therefore, not conflating Judaism with Zionism was at the core of Zionism from day one.

Do you know how dangerous it is to engage in a reasonable discussion with someone untethered from reality? Try asking: how many deserts Zionist Jews managed to bloom lately? Just questioning if it was true (that Zionist Jews managed to reverse global warming and bloom the Negev desert) would be enough to turn you into an antisemite! If you have a death wish, try asking Zionist Jews to share their DNA test results!

Let us ask Reinhard Heydrich, The Architect of the Holocaust, If Anti-Zionism Is Antisemitism!

To prove how ridiculous a demand this is, let us imagine enforcing such a rule in Nazi Germany. If Nazis conflated Zionism with Judaism, Zionists would have been the first to be persecuted. On the other hand, the facts show that the exact opposite happened. Not only did the father of antisemitism (Adolf Hitler) normalize Zionism when it was a fringe and despised group, but Hitler also showered them with privileges that only a few Aryans enjoyed. For God's sake, not for Hitler, Zionist enterprises (i.e., the Jewish Agency, JNF, etc.) during the great depression would have been liquidated (due to American Jewry cutting off funding during the Great Depression). We wonder: why would the father of antisemitism bail out Zionists in the knick of time? Should Jews be thankful that Hitler didn't conflate Judaism with Zionism as anti-Zionists currently do? What the heck, Nazis even enshrined the Zionist flag in the Nuremberg Laws to be one of the two allowed flags to be raised.

Adolf Eichmann & company coined a special gold medal in honor of the Nazis' Haavara relationship with Zionists!Adolf Eichmann in Haifa, Palestine, in 1937! We wonder what the Angel of Death was doing in Palestine. Was he there to meet with Mufti Hajj Amin or Haganah's chief?

When you examine how hard-core Nazis (such as Adolf Hitler, Adolf Eichmann, and Reinhard Heydrich) thought of Zionism, you might lose your mind. Many will be surprised to know that it was an open secret that most hard-core Nazis were fond of Zionism (Hitler even praised them in Mein Kampf), and many openly admired this Jewish Nationalist ideology. Many will be shocked to know that most German bureaucrats (civil servants, especially at the Reichsbank) were against extending the Haavara Agreement by early 1938. All warned Hitler that implementing this agreement would come at a great expense, and Germany's support could end up creating a "Jewish state," which would alienate millions of Arabs against the Nazi regime. Hitler didn't heed their advice and extended the Haavara Agreement anyhow, which continued to function until FDR shut it down in Dec. 1941.

Ship St. Louis Havana Port, 1939In May 1939, MS St. Louis in Havana was refused to unload its Jewish passengers in Cuba & US, and it was forced to go back to Antwerp. The Jewish Agency refused to give any of its passengers immigration certificate visas to Palestine. Over 250 of those passengers perished during the Holocaust.

YES, we agree that the Nazis may not have been Zionists (which is not relevant to this discussion). However, for sure, Hitler's policies and actions were never anti-Zionist. Meaning Nazis' policies and actions were pro-Zionist in practice, and that was all the Zionist Jewry cared about. Actually, when the facts are examined, we find the Nazis favored Zionists with many privileges that only a few Aryans got, and both groups avoided fighting each other even at the height of the calamity. It is worth pointing out also that the Jewish Agency's office in Berlin closed its doors as late as May 1941. Here is an excellent short clip documenting how Nazis were fond of Zionists. Trust us, it will be worth your time; we vouch for its contents. At length, we have addressed this subject in a couple of sections and sections here as well:

Zionists-And-The-Nazis-Similar-Flags-Birds-Of-A-Feather-Flocks-Together Nazis vs. Zionists: Two sides of the same coin

Notice how Zionists' circular, cynical logic rendered Nazi leaders not antisemitic (since they were never anti-Zionists)! The average readers who know very little about the Zionist movement might say: yes, Nazis may not have been anti-Zionists, but that doesn't imply they were not antisemites. YES, we agree that could be the case, but once you examine Zionists' records, you will rarely find a European antisemite whom Zionists didn't work with hand over fist! Here is the shortlist: Russian Tsars and their antisemitic ministers, Symon Petliura, Arthur Balfour, Winston Churchill, Mussolini, Adolf Hitler, Reinhard Heydrich, Adolf Eichmann, South Africa's apartheid regime, Argentina's military junta (see Tony Greenstein excellent research how something as Haavara was replicated in Argentina at the expense of Jewish lives, p. 190-192),..etc. That said, the astute readers shouldn't be surprised since this is exactly what Herzl instructed his followers to do: Don't confront antisemites, and eventually, they shall become Zionists' best friends (see The Transfer Agreement, p. 226). This policy served Zionists well until the Holocaust was underway. Nazis exploited Herzl's instruction in the ghettos when they employed mostly Zionists as Kapos, and that had dangerous ramifications.

Rabbis March On DC Oct-1943 Fake Valor: When American Rabbis marched in DC in Oct. 1943 to lobby for rescuing Jews, you would think Zionists supported them?

Don't you find it odd how Zionist Jews eagerly worked hand in hand with every European antisemite (who were reluctant even to fight them during the calamity) but managed to weaponize antisemitism in the process to legitimize Palestinians' replacement and dispossession? Mazeltov, Zionist Jews, give yourself a big hand. In the process of demonizing Palestinians, you've managed to provide Nazis a free pass on their antisemitism! Love it or hate it, this is precisely what Bibi Netanyahu implied when he blamed the Mufti Hajj Amin for the Holocaust; therefore, Bibi provided Hitler with an alibi! Do you understand why the promoters of the so-called great replacement are flocking to embrace and promote "Anti-Zionism is Antisemitism"? YES, it's the same ones who adopted the America Second slogan. Sorry, we meant to say the American First slogan! Just in case you haven't recognized it yet, Zionism Is Antisemitism, which explains why often birds of a feather flock together.

Zionists-And-The-Nazis-Similar-Flags-Birds-Of-A-Feather-Flocks-Together Look who is copying from Joseph Goebbels' propaganda playbook. Birds of a feather always flock together

Right arrow free icon Yes, ladies and gentlemen, Zionism is originally an antisemitic idea (deeply rooted in the Lutheran Church) that was adopted four centuries later by Theodor Herzl (the founder of Zionism) after the Dreyfus Trial in the late 19th century, which Europe's Jews universally rejected. To learn more about Herzl's antisemitism and how that affected Zionists from the beginning, we urge you to read his Mauschel article; then, you will understand that Zionists' antisemitism was done by design. Weaponizing Jewish hate was the Zionists' golden goose; it keeps on going, and that is why Europe's Jews didn't want to be part of them.

Right arrow free icon In this regard, we have to ask: is it possible that Palestinians have become the last Semites and Zionist Jews have become the neo-antisemites? Is it possible that Nazis knew well whom they were dealing with and didn't make the common mistake of conflating Jews with Zionist Jews? The same logic applies to most European antisemites, especially to the notorious antisemite Winston Churchill, who blamed German Jews for their plight as late as Sept 1937! Just in case you are still high on your Hasbarah supply, and you haven't recognized that Zionism is a terrible and dangerous disease of the mind, then stay tuned.

Dangers of conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism 

Why do you think Zionist Organizations are actively promoting "I Love Hamas" Stickers? How many similar schemes were done, and we are ignorant about who was behind them?

If Zionist leaders and the founding fathers of the "Jewish state" already knew that this was a ridiculous demand to be demanded from Palestinians and Arabs, then we're forced to ask these hard questions:

  • How does improperly weaponizing antisemitism not debase antisemitism, which Zionist Jews "claim" to care the most about?
  • Since this phenomenon started in 2016 (Prof. Darek Pansler of Harvard put it in the late 1990s. Why did the weaponization of antisemitism not start soon after Nakba? Why has it been delayed for seven decades?
  • Since the mass majority of Europe's Jews were anti-Zionists, and the religious Jewish establishment petitioned the UN against the creation of the Jewish state, does that imply they were antisemites, too? Therefore, based on this dangerous logic, not only hard-core Nazis got a free pass on antisemitism, but most importantly, the anti-Zionist Jewish victims of the Holocaust (mostly BUND) have become antisemitic! All this nonsense explains how and why those who survived the Holocaust and kept their anti-Zionist activities were labeled by Zionists as SELF-HATING JEWS. Are you surprised? Imagine those Jews who looked down upon the assimilationist Jews are "considered as the good Jews"! Many will be shocked to know that it was the other way around before Hitler rose to power.

    Right arrow free icon To put it simply, antisemitism is just a weapon (often used as a political and propaganda weapon to stifle debate), and it could be weaponized by Jews and non-Jews alike (often done with dangerous consequences). In this case, Zionists weaponized antisemitism against Jews way before they started weaponizing it against Palestinians! Watch out and be prepared if you become at its receiving end; you have been warned! Please watch this brave American Jew for 70 seconds, who has articulated this point:



    ...or watch for two minutes these brave anti-Zionist American Jews who are tired of weaponizing Never Again against Palestinians:


    ...or watch this brave Canadian Jew reporting on how Israeli colonial settlers were paying trolls to foment Jewish hate, which later could be exploited politically. That is what happens when real antisemitism is at an all-time low; therefore, the statistics had to be pumped! ADL feeds off this garbage; for some people, this is an industry:

    Just in case you think this false flag was the exception and not the rule, please think twice. Here is the short list of Zionist and Israeli false flag operations. And if you have the time, please watch Michael Barenboim for 90 seconds (a Jewish German who heads the Chamber Music at the Barenboim-Said Academy in Berlin) categorically rejects what Israel stands for: "Israel tries to present itself as the only representation of Jews, I don't want to be represented by Israel, quite the contrary":

    If you have seven minutes to spare, please watch Katie Halper dismantle Zionists' main arguments on this topic:
  • Adolf Eichmann & company coined a special gold Mendelian in the honor of Nazis' Haavara relationship with Zionists!Adolf Eichmann & company coined a special Gold Medallion in honor of the Nazis' relationship with Zionists! Do you have any ideas why he visited Palestine in 1937?
    Even in the case of Jews who considered themselves Zionists but opposed the concept of a "Jewish state" (an idea that most European Jews universally opposed since that would raise a dual loyalty problem), they had become antisemites based on this ridiculous rule. You are welcome to examine what Albert Einstein wrote before and after the war Nakba, especially what he wrote after the infamous Deir Yassin massacre, when he predicted how Zionists would eventually bring a Nakba upon Jews. Hannah Arendt, Judah Magnus, and Eric Frum were known to have similar points of view. Some will be surprised to know that antisemitism weaponization was a standard tool by Zionists against their Jewish opponents, and that predates Nakba. We urge you to examine how Zionist leaders weaponized antisemitism against the Rabbis who marched to the White House at the peak of the calamity. The Rabbis hoped to force FDR to do something meaningful to save Jews; sadly, Zionist leaders did everything possible to torpedo their efforts, including weaponizing antisemitism against them.

    We ask: Why did Zionists Leaders lobby against rescuing Jews during WWII? We wonder what was in it for the Zionists when they incited the murder of Jews? Was antisemitism ever bad for Zionists and Zionism? Does this explain why Zionists always favored fomenting antisemitism? Why change a winning formula? Let's see what David Ben-Gurion had to say a month after the Kristallnacht pogrom in late 1938. Remember, Ben-Gurion's hate speech preceded Hitler's hate speech at the Reichstag by 60 days or less. Were the brothers in hate communicating?
  • Fake Valor: Why Did Zionist Jews Hoist Nazis Flag on Their Ships in the 1930s?
    In the case of the American Jewish community, how is asking such a stupid demand from Arabs, Palestinians, and Westerners who support the Palestinian cause not a self-defeating strategy? When Zionist Jews are engaged in forcing their farce demands, how does that not reflect badly on them? Since 60% of Americans between the ages of 18 and 24 see the Oct. 7Th Raid as justified (effectively implying that Palestine shall be free from the river and the sea), why not add the future American leaders and voters to the Zionists' antisemitic list? That would seem the perfect winning strategy! Even better, send brown and black shirt fascists (a.k.a. the Proud Boys) to beat up pro-Palestine encampments at college campuses. Watch this 5-minute video from CNN, and then you shall recognize how birds of a feather flock together:
  • The Zionist Version Of Lebensraum: A Map Of The Great Israel
    Since most of the countries that voted for the UN partition plan also voted for the Palestinian refugees' right to return to their stolen lands and homes. On the other hand, all know well known that the implementation of the Palestinians' right of return resolution would effectively reduce the Jewish majority to a minority (many would argue that is already the case between the river and the sea). Therefore, based on Zionist Jews' cynical circular genius logic, the United States, Great Britain, and France (who voted for the right of return resolution) are also antisemitic as well! It should be noted that not long ago, much of the UN voted for a resolution that equated Zionism with racism when the vast majority of nations voted for the resolution. It was reversed only during the early days of the Oslo Accords.
  • Since the American Jewish community has been used as the tip of the spear in marketing Zionist Big Lies (especially since the 6-Day War, here is proof), do they care that these policies reflect poorly on them?
  • Is it possible that Zionist leaders' goal is to foment antisemitism? Didn't they do the same thing in the 1930s, and in return, they were rewarded handsomely?
  • Does anyone in the West care that antisemitism is being intentionally fomented?
Palestinians were ethnically cleansed out of al-Tantura in May of 1948; soon after, 200+ men were massacred.

In the rest of this article, we shall address all these questions, but first, we have to briefly introduce how European Jewry confronted Zionism in the 1930s and 40s. As we investigated the Haavara Agreement, we were shocked to discover that most European Jews (especially those in Germany, Austria, and Hungary) knew well how dangerous Zionists could be, and that is why they looked upon them as the enemy from within. When Zionists fomented antisemitism (an evil process that Ben-Gurion often referred to as the LEVER) in the 1930s, the animosity between both groups grew, and it persisted after the war (see Kapos files for the details). That is why the majority of Europe's Jews voted with their feet and immigrated to the Americas to live with the Gentiles, even after Palestine was emptied.

The Dual Loyalty Trap

Jewish-Brigade, April-1945: Impostering Heroes, see me while I bomb Nazis in Italy. Any taken at al Alamein! Fake Valor: Jewish-Brigade, Italy April - 1945: The Impostering Hero, see me while I bomb Nazis, ONLY a few weeks before WWII ended. We wonder: Were any similar selfies taken at the al-Alamein meat grinder?

What has been tragically sad is that American Jews and their leaders knew well for seven decades that conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism (and conflating Judaism with the "Jewish state") is very dangerous, which could risk fomenting antisemitism (see how Abraham Gurman describes the dual loyalty problem, which Hitler exploited as a political tool). This is an open secret in the American Jewish community. In fact, it was openly debated in early 1944 at the peak of the Holocaust! This explains why they delayed approving the weaponization of antisemitism by almost seven decades (watch Geoffrey Levin articulating our point for the next 10 to 12 minutes starting from 6:00).

Therefore, American Jews and their Jewish leaders didn't just sleepwalk into this trap; YES they could be arrogant, but they are not ignorant; they knew well of the risks of becoming Zionists' useful idiot. This fact has a dangerous implication, as it has been articulated by Abraham Gutman in 2021:

Rabbis March On DC Oct-1943 Fake Valor: When American Rabbis marched in DC in Oct. 1943 to lobby for rescuing Jews, you would think Zionists supported them?
It is this conflation between Israel and Judaism, one that is baked into the foundation of Israel and perpetuated by its leaders, that leads to a problematic tautology: Israel’s leaders represent all Jewish people, and thus by definition any criticism of Israel must be criticism of all Jewish people — and hence antisemitic.

This tautology allows accusations of antisemitism to be weaponized, particularly against people who speak up about Palestinian rights — sometimes in ridiculous ways. (Supporting Palestinian rights is antisemitic because Israel wants it to be by Abraham Gutman)

[In the early 1950s, David Ben-Gurion (the founder of the "Jewish state") attempted to play this dangerous game but American Jewry were up in arms and managed quickly muzzle him. The 1950s financial crisis almost bankrupted Israel, and American Jewry used it as leverage. They refused to extend a billion dollars' worth of bonds to Israel unless Ben-Gurion gave them the exception they demanded! YES, this massive capital injection into a tiny country in the early 1950s was more like an indulgence fee!

That is how the Dual Loyalty trap was important for American Jewry. For those who care, we managed to track the exact signed document between Ben-Gurion and American Jewry. This modus-aprende continued for 75 years, and it seems after the Oct. 7th Gaza Raid, American Jewry caved in and gave the green light to breaking this agreement. Thus, American Jews were not sleeping on the wheel; they knew of the dangers. More on that later on.
]

That said, we are forced to conclude that the American Jewish community and its leaders are either desperate to protect Israel, plain stupid, reckless, don't care about their community, or a combination of all the above! Sadly, the last option seems to be the most plausible answer. On the subject of dual loyalty, we urge you to read what Peter Grose wrote (on p. 80) about how this issue (at least to American Jewry) was as old as Zionism itself. The issue of dual loyalty terrified American Jews way before the Holocaust, and it flared up every once in a while. Mr. Grose cited this issue many times over the first eight decades of the Zionist movement. From our point of view, the whole book "Israel In The Mind of America" is a must-read, and you can borrow it for free at Archive.org.

We were shocked to discover that Nahum Goldmann (one of the most important founders of the "Jewish state" and one of the most important American Jewish leaders) warned about the dangers of weaponizing antisemitism and the Holocaust. Sadly, in the early 1950s, Dorothy Thomson (a fierce advocate of Jewish refugees before and during the Holocaust when most Jews were silent) was publicly canceled when she warned the Jews of the dual loyalty trap. For her service, antisemitism was quickly weaponized against her, and she was quickly dropped from public life.

Therefore, what we wrote was widely known in the American Jewish community, and it is not just an anti-Zionist rant!

Browse hundreds of pictures showing Palestinians being ethnically cleansed from their homes

Right arrow free icon Here is the unvarnished truth:  those who often weaponize antisemitism not only don't care about it, but for them, it is the Golden Goose that keeps on laying Golden Eggs! That said, we feel they are in their last throes and intensification of antisemitism weaponization lately because Zionists (and their supporters) are so disparate despite their hegemony over American politicians and mainstream media (see the short clips below). The Oct. 7th Raid exposed how fragile their Zionist project has been! Their Big Lies are being exposed at an alarming rate by Gen Z on social media (many of whom are Jewish), who are no longer willing to buy their Hasbarah. And without Western support, this Zionist project will collapse under its weight in a generation or two. Therefore, the Zionists' intensification of weaponizing antisemitism is proof that they are in panic mode. Sadly, what is happening now in the West (especially in the Americas) resembles exactly what Zionists did in the 1930s when they were the first to normalize trade and relations with Hitler for 8 to 9 years straight with no interruption. The question is: will American Jews and their leaders behave exactly as they did during WWII? Let us hope that won't be the case for their sake, but frankly, as you see below from Prof. Alan Dershowitz's performance, this doesn't look promising:


Just in case you think this is a deep fake video (as Bibi Netanyahu once did when he used deep fake videos and pictures to fool former President Trump), think twice. It is on Stand With Us' Facebook page (here's Bibi Netanyahu saying something similar, but in the early 1980s).

If you care, we have asked Google's AI Gemini to reflect on what Alan saidHere is how it unpacked it. Hang on to your seat first: speaking the truth, citing the facts, and the obvious has become antisemitic.

Right arrow free icon The Jewish control of the media is an open secret, as evidenced by a private conversation in early 1972 between former US President Richard Nixon and Rev. Billy Graham. The two men discussed this "Jewish hegemony" and alluded to the problem of dual loyalty, noting that Jews were supportive of Nixon because of his backing for Israel. Both Nixon and Graham acknowledged the reality of this influence but were afraid to discuss it publicly. One must ask: Why the secrecy?
Map-of-Palestine-and-Houran-1843
Map-of-Palestine-and-Houran-1843

Here is Prof. Norman Finkelstein speaking of the open secret about "Jewish hegemony" in Hollywood; he hinted at a much bigger taboo subject in the last 20 seconds:

Right arrow free icon Here are way more details concerning what Finkelstein alluded to earlier. We vouch for its contents. Actually, we were surprised how Tablet Magazine, by far a pro-Zionist publication, published a similar content about the Kosher Nostra:

Watch President Trump explaining Zionist Jewry's Dual Loyalty like no other. Hang on to your seat:

As you digest Alan's earlier short clip, please keep in mind that former US President Jimmy Carter was at the receiving end of endless antisemitism weaponization (which coincided with the release of his book Peace Not Apartheid in 2007) when he slightly alluded to what Prof. Dershowitz described earlier. If you ever dare to speak of the obvious, you will be immediately accused of peddling antisemitic tropes:

Here is Reza Shah Bahlavi (who was known to be a close ally to the "Jewish state") saying the somethings Alan spoke of earlier (which was a few years before he was toppled) to Mike Wallace, but he added that Jewish power in the US is being recklessly exercised in ways that would end up hurting Israel and world Jewry (i.e, AIPAC is fomenting antisemitism). Notice Mike's acting skills, as if he didn't know what the Shah was talking about:

JFK said it BEST in 1939: Palestine Was Hardly Britain's to Give Away

What Alan and the Shah spoke about earlier is an open secret in DC, but talking about it is a big taboo that could get you canceled. That being said, all changed after Oct. 7th. The gatekeepers are on the ropes; we have addressed this rarely talked about topic in another section. AIPAC from day one operated in the shadows exactly like the mob. But as we outlined earlier, that all changed after the Oct. 7th Raid. To make our case, we urge you to watch Michael Rosenberg for less than a minute, who worked for AIPAC for 6 years. Here is a transcript of what he said:

I have a somewhat unique perspective on AIPAC owing to the fact that I was employed there for 6 years. Back when I first started AIPAC, Steve Rosen, who was my boss and was later indicted for espionage against the United States. I know like he's still around, though. You're allowed to get indicted for espionage. Uh, he sent me a now-famous memo. It's now famous because I gave it to the Washington Post. Uh, he wrote he warned me never to talk. This is my second day there. Never to talk about AIPAC activities outside the lobby. He wrote A lobby is a nightflower. It thrives in the dark and shrivels up in the sunlight.

If you care, here is Mr. Rosenberg's full interview to watch.

God forbid, copycat versions of Hitler would emerge in the US or Europe (who would weaponize Alan's earlier arguments), then who can call them liars? Didn't Alan's arguments precisely describe Hitler's version of "the Jew"? Now, allow this analogy to sink in for a minute. Let's not be too harsh in judging Herr Hitler; Winston Churchill's version of "the Jew" didn't wander far off Hitler's assessment; that was the norm in the "civilized and liberal" West! If the subject of "Jewish Hegemony over the media" interests you and you have 15 minutes to spare, we urge you to watch this fair assessment by Ken LaCorte. After you have watched it, please read the comments to know how the average person knows the hidden secret. This is an open secret in Hollywood. We have saved a copy of the video just in case it is taken down, which is predictable and understandable.

Palestinian Replacement In A Single Picture: al-Tira's school before and after Nakba. The same place but different people

It should be noted that Hitler's arguments about the disloyalty of the German Jewish community were grounded entirely in pure fiction. You can take what we wrote to the bank; we didn't write this sentence in defense of German Jewry. This was the truth after we did years of investigating the Haavara Agreements; we were floored to discover that German Jewry was very loyal and lobbied against boycotting the German economy. YES, German Jews were considered affluent upper-middle-class, but they were tiny (actually, they were shrinking due to conversion since Jews were emancipated in 1871) and they were very well integrated in the German society. The case of Hans Achim Litten is a great example of someone who was erased from memory until the BBC uncovered his story a few years ago (the same applies to Hannah Arendt and Albert Einstein). Most importantly, Germany's Jews rarely used their wealth, education, and professions to wield political power; politically speaking, they kept a low profile. Honestly, this discovery came to us as a big surprise. At a minimum, we expected German Jewry to have behaved like the American one! To this date, it has been baffling how and why Germans turned so quickly against their Jewish citizens! In any case, at length, we have addressed this subject in another section.

Power leads to arrogance, and arrogance leads to madness. When arrogance is cross-pollinated with madness, both shall continue to grow until they implode!

Related Link

 

Post Your Comment

The N*zi section should be evident that nothing what the N*zi ever did hindered the Z*onist movement almost everything they did was in complete solidarity with them and once they better grasp understanding the movement they liked it, specific intruders should smashed with this knowledge to bug off
 
Fake Valor: Why Did Zionist Jews Hoist Nazis Flag on Their Ships in the 1930s?

What is new?