Haavara Agreement: Shabtai Teveth in "The Burning Ground 1888-1948" went out of his way to concoct excuses for David Ben-Gurion's antisemitism

Shabtai Teveth (David Ben-Gurion's official biographer) in "The Burning Ground 1888-1948" went out of his way to jutify for Ben-Gurion's antisemitism by claiming that not one country opened its gates to Jewish refugees after the Evian Conference, and painted Palestine as the only viable and available haven for Jews. Based on our extensive research on this particular topic, we found that actually many countries at the Evian Conference wanted to receive Europe's Jews, and it was the Zionists (especially those who are based in the US) who lobbied to frustrate their efforts. Pay attention to how Dan Kurzman (one of Ben-Gurion's official biographers who was cited by the NYTimes in July 1987) and a pro-Zionist Wikipedia editor destroyed this big lie; keep scrolling for the details. Our analysis continues below the image.

That being said, we are forced to ask: Why did Mr. Teveth, Edwin Black, and many Jewish historians (including the liberal Tom Segev) go out of their way to cover up, minimize, and gaslight Ben-Gurion's infamous antisemitic hate speech a month after the Kristallnacht pogrom of late 1938? Are you surprised that it was Adolf Hitler who followed Ben-Gurion with his infamous hate speech at the Reichstag on Jan. 30th, 1939? There were fewer than two months between those two hate speeches? Is it possible that Herr Ben-Gurion was speaking directly to Hitler? That would explain why Ben-Gurion refused to retract his antisemitism. Is it possible that Zionist leaders translated Ben-Gurion's speech into a policy during WWII, who managed to turn Jews' pain and suffering into THE LEVER (the jujitsu of politics) that would end up creating their "Jewish state"? Does this explain why investigating Zionists' policies and actions during the 1930s-40s was NIXED in the early 1980s?