Haavara FAQs: Is it true that Palestine was the ONLY viable place that welcomed Jews during the 1930s and 40s, and it was the British who doomed the lives of millions of Jews?

Hitler's Message To The West: If Jews are such noble citizens and you care about them, how come you're not letting them in?

Shamelessly, many Jewish and Zionist so-called historians keep repeating the BIG LIE that Palestine was the only viable destination for Europe's Jewish refugees (to name a few, see, for example, Shabtai Teveth, Edwin Black in The Transfer Agreement, p. 379 and the American Jewish Conference - Nov. 1st, 1944, p.  119). We have researched this myth from multiple angles to find any validity to its central claim, and all found the exact opposite. As it will proven shortly from Zionist and Israeli sources, Zionists of all shades (except for a few in Bergson Group) lobbied to make Palestine the only destination for Europe's Jews in the 1930s-40s and lobbied feverishly against any viable third alternative. To quickly destroy this myth, note how the mass majority of the German and Austrian Jewry were saved before Hitler close Europe's exists in late 1941, and Palestine played a role in saving a few thousands of them.

Before we address this myth in depth, it's important to note the following points: i) According to the British White Paper of 1939, Zionists were granted 75,000 immigration certificates, many of which remained unused during the war (as of Jan. 1943, less than half were used). Irrespective of the reasons, this implies that Zionists couldn't consume the available certificates even if what was available was much larger. This fact continued until the end of the war. ii) Hitler closed Europe's borders only in late 1941. Meaning the door was open for Jews to leave freely for eight years. iii) Everyone knew well that Palestine was a small country, already it was crowded with people who did not welcome Zionists, it had limited resources, and most importantly, Palestine could not save millions of Jews. Zionists knew that at most several hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees could arrive even if Palestine was emptied of its indigenous people and its doors swung open (as it was the case soon after Nakba), and that is what Zionists planned for as of Oct. 1942. iv) Arab Jews were only brought into the picture when Zionists knew for sure that European Jews would not be coming, and they needed "any kind of Jews" to fill in the void. Love it or hate, to this date, Europe's Jews prefer to live with the Gentile; that is why they immigrated to the Americas even after Palestine was emptied of its people.

The Indigenous People (Over 90% Of Citizens) Made It Clear: No More Zionist Immigration

Were the British so STUPID as to promise COMPLETE INDEPENDENCE to Palestinians in 1939 (who, of course, "didn't exist") while the Indians had been DREAMING of such a thing for 400 years?

A) Between 1936 and 1939, the Palestinian people started one of the largest anti-colonial struggles at the time in what became known as the Great Arab Revolt of 1936, and it was ignited by the increase of Jewish immigration to their country. Palestinians, like all colonized Indigenous peoples, feared imminent replacement and dispossession, which later became known as the Nakba. In return for terminating the revolt and for Arab support during WWII, the British agreed to impose severe limits on future Jewish immigration based on the White Paper of 1939 (which effectively reversed the Balfour Declaration). Thus, from the start, the indigenous people (who made up over 90% of citizens and to this date still owns 94% of the lands) made it clear that those who are plotting to replace them are never welcome. On top of that, the colonial occupying power, Great Britain, promised Palestinians a complete independence after the war ends. Therefore, Palestine was neither available nor viable, especially to hostile refugees who openly plotted to replace the indigenous people.

This explains why Zionists of all shades made defeating the White Paper their top priority, and for that to happen, Jews had to become a majority by any means possible. But how could Zionists direct Europe's Jews to Palestine? Simple, Theodor Herzl provided the blueprint three decades earlier in the late 19th century: 1) Instigate and exploit Jewish refugee crises to the maximum, 2) foment antisemitism where it didn't exist, and 3) close any viable exits unless Palestine was the ONLY destination; that is how the "Jewish state" could be built in a record time.

Jewish Immigration Before WWII

B) We were shocked to discover that the renowned banking family of Hamburg, the Warburg, financed the resettlement of twice as many as German and Austrian Jews, compared with those who immigrated to Palestine. The Warburg family saved almost 90,000 German and Austrian Jews between 1933 and late 1941 in a little known program called Hilfsverein which Zionist fought with tooth and nail. Now imagine what would've happened if Zionists' lobbying activities against the Warburg family succeed in shutting down their resettlement activities?

JFK said it BEST in 1939: Palestine Was Hardly Britain's to Give Away

C) Most importantly, please keep in mind that Palestine was only one of twenty-plus colonies under British colonial rule inclusive of the Jewel in the crown India and the nearby Cyprus. For the love of God, the British successfully resettled fifty Jewish families in British Guiana, in the West Indies, during WWII, although Zionists lobbied the US State Department against such things in Latin and South America. It seems Zionist leaders were "concerned" that such a Jewish immigration would increase antisemitic sentiment in the Americas (see Politics of Rescue, p. 101), but there was no such concer for Palestine! The same logic applies to the Dominican Republic and to the former German colonies in Africa (such as Namibia, which was administered by the United Nations at times with a mandate structure as the one that governed Palestine between the world wars). Well, take a wild guess who fought those resettlement schemes with tooth and nail? Is it possible Zionists did the same when Alaska was proposed as a haven for Jews?

Jewish Immigration After WWII

D) After WWII was underway and before the Holocaust, Hitler kept Europe's doors open for Jews to leave, and that continued until late 1941. This explains why the majority of German and Austrian Jews had a high survival rate while other Jewish communities were decimated. Remember that most of those Jews weren't saved in Palestine, and the Haavara Agreement played no role in saving them; allow that to sink in for a minute. Factually, before Europe's exit doors were closed, we found that many countries had already saved tens of thousands of German and Austrian Jews in Mexico, Latin America, and South America. For example, a small area like Latin America alone saved almost 100,000 Jews in a very short period between 1938 and 1942. We hate to keep reminding the reader that Zionist leaders in the US (Rabbi Stephen Wise and Nahum Goldmann) lobbied the US State Department against their entry to Latin America since that could increase antisemitism (see Politics of Rescue, p. 101). YES, Zionists weaponized antisemitism to discourage Latin Americans from saving Jews!

David Ben-Gurion envisioned that Nazis' Nuremberg Race Laws would become the LEVER that would end up creating the "Jewish state," but how? Click the image for the details

Just imagine this counterfactual scenario: what if Zionists really managed to close Latin and South America to Jewish immigration during those critical years, then the Holocaust would have been much worse! For the love of God, the same tactic was used during Rabbis' march and the Alaska scheme during the war. Based on our research, many more countries would have welcomed Jews as long as they were self-sustaining with some cash.

Not for the great depression, many countries would have opened their doors. Thus, when the numbers are added up, we found that 9 to 10 times more German and Austrian Jews were SAVED in countries other than Palestine than in Palestine itself. Palestine, in total, took in between 44,000 to 50,000 German and Austrian Jews; no more, and that includes those who arrived during WWII. What was tragically funny was that before WWII was underway (in the Fall of 1939), Zionist leaders could have saved way more German and Austrian Jews than they "did", and it was their choice not to do so. Zionists allotted way more immigration certificates to those who were more ideologically aligned with them (Halutzim), like those in Poland. We were shocked to discover that close to 60% of those poor German and Austrian Jews (who gained entry to Palestine) were saved because of British affirmative action. YES, at a moment of crisis, the British favored German Jews, and Zionists looked the other way although the knives were hanging over German Jewry's neck.

Fake Valor: Daddy, what did you do during the Holocaust while you were in Palestine?

E) Even after Hitler closed Europe's door in late 1941, still, hundreds of thousands of Jews were saved in areas other than Palestine. It is worth emphasizing that during 1944-45, FDR's War Refugee Board (WRB) saved close to 200,000 Jews during the war without sending them to Palestine! It should be noted that the WRB would have been impossible not for the hard work of the Rabbis and Bergson Group, who faced incredible hostility from the Zionist movement. In this regard, we ask you again to imagine this counterfactual scenario: what if Ben-Gurion & Co. managed to shut down those brave Jews in the Bergson Group who made WRB possible in late 1943? In other words, the Holocaust would have been much worse than it was, wouldn't it?

F) This sinister evil policy persisted even after the war ended in the DP Camps.

Fake Valor: When American Rabbis marched in DC in Oct. 1943 to lobby for rescuing Jews, you would think Zionists supported them?

G) Four years before the Holocaust, David Ben-Gurion & Co. at the Jewish Agency used to refer to saving Jews outside of Palestine as more like "Witch Doctor's Medicine". In layman's terms, those Jews who saved themselves in countries other than Palestine were doomed anyhow; therefore, that was a waste of resources and money. Now do you understand why the word "rescue" used to have negative connotations when Zionist leaders used to hear it in the 1930s and 40s! (The Burning Ground by Shabtai Teveth, p. 854) YES, even their stomachs used to turn when they hear it!

Why did Great Britain indict two of Israel's future PMs on charges of terrorism? Those evil British must have been "Jew-hating" antisemites!

Here is the unvarnished truth: the mass majority of countries refused entry to immigrants in general (not just Jews) because of financial reasons. Those countries felt it wasn't fair to take in impoverished refugees, especially when their economies didn't recover from the Great Depression. Also, many felt that taking refugees in while penniless was encouraging the Nazis, and that was understandable (why take in refugees after Hitler dispossessed them; that was indirect funding for the Nazis). Sadly, many Jews, to this date, still conflate anti-immigration policies with antisemitism, which is unfair (exactly as many nations behave nowadays towards refugees and migrants, although the world economy isn't in pain). Despite the Great Depression, tens of thousands of the penniless German and Austrian Jews found refuge in Canada, Mexico, Latin, South, and the Americas, and that was at least 9 to 10 times as many as those who made it to Palestine from the same cohort (note how Haavara played no role saving any of those).

In a nutshell, this big lie was concocted out of the blue in the service of turning Jews' plight into the LEVER (using David Ben-Gurion's sinister terminology) that would defeat the White Paper of 1939, thus making the creation of the "Jewish state" possible.

Fake Valor: Why did two of Israel's future PMs, Menachem Begin and Yizhak Shamir, bomb WWII war efforts while their families were being gassed in Poland?

Therefore, in practice, Zionists executed David Ben-Gurion's infamous antisemitic hate speech to the maximum to increase their political leverage, which he articulated a month after the Kristallnacht pogrom. We believe it is worthwhile watching Peter Bergson for two and half minutes talking about the Rabbis' march in DC that he was part of in the Fall of 1943, the obstetrical they faced from Zionists (which he referred to as "monkey wrenches"), how the Bergson Boys lobbied to rescue Europe's Jews in the US Congress, and most importantly how Zionists fought his group with tooth and nail because they didn't advocate saving Europe's Jews ONLY to Palestine. Make sure to watch Mr. Bergson to the last second and remember this happened when the last million and a half were alive:

Fake Valor: Jewish-Brigade, Italy April - 1945: The Impostering Hero, see me while I bomb Nazis. We wonder: were any similar selfies taken at the al-Alamein meat grinder?

Just in case you think what we shared was an anti-Zionist rant, please think twice. American Jewry investigated this particular point and it was quickly nixed in early 1983! But first, please be seated. This is one of the biggest taboos ever.

Finally, note how Zionists are masters of shifting the blame to hide their treason. Not only did they use the British as the perfect deflection tool, but they also used FDR, IBM. Henry Ford, and Mufti Haj Amin as well. All are guilty of antisemitism except for Zionists, who fomented antisemitism and turned it into the LEVER to create their "Jewish state." Mazeltov, dear Jews, on this wonderful ideology; now give yourselves a big hand.