Palestinian Refugees on their way to Lebanon, Oct. 1948.
The Arabic term Nakba, meaning "catastrophe," refers to the dispossession and ethnic cleansing experienced by the Palestinian people during and after the 1948 war with Zionist forces in British-mandated Palestine. This event was pivotal, leading to the establishment of the "Jewish state," where the Jews quickly became 85% of the citizens when they were under 10% in 1947. For Palestinians, the indigenous population, the Nakba resulted in the dispossession and replacement of three out of every four people, a population that now numbers over 14 million.
Palestinian Replacement In A Single Picture:al-Tira's school before and after Nakba. The same place, but different people
The situation leading up to 1948 was complex. Pre-WWII British-mandated Palestine was pressured to absorb a disproportionate number of European Jewish refugees, a period when the US and Canada largely closed their doors. Despite Jews making up less than 10% of the citizens and owning under 6% of the land, Zionist leaders demanded independence in 1948. This untenable situation led the UN to intervene in late 1947, imposing a Partition Plan.
Palestinians overwhelmingly perceived the partitioning of their country as unjust and unfair and therefore rejected it, leading to the outbreak of the "War of Nakba," which lasted 11 months.
From the Palestinian perspective, accepting the partition of their country when they were the vast majority of citizens and landowners was unacceptable.
Why Do Jews Deny the Nakba?
Remind Us Please:Who shall push whom into the sea. This was the scene at Jaffa harbor, May 1948.
To this day, the vast majority of Jews fiercely deny this Palestinian replacement, even though the Nakba has continued since 1948 and destroyed Palestinian villages that remain visible across the landscape. This denial provides emotional comfort, as many Jews, including non-Zionists, cannot reconcile the image of Holocaust survivors committing such acts so soon after the Shoah. This explains why Palestinians' resistance is often framed by the Jews as terrorism, and Israeli terrorism, ethnic cleansing and land theft are often framed as self-defense.
Palestinians were ethnically cleansed out of al-Ramla & al-Lydd in July 1948 by Zionist Jewish forces, as you see, based on direct orders from Ben-Gurion, and executed by Yitzhak Rabin.
In a morally perverted way, Prof. Scott Galloway provided one of the best explanations for why the Jews mostly deny the Nakba and Gaza's genocide. He stated in an interview with Senate candidate Abdul el-Sayed that if the Jews committed a genocide in Gaza, that would foment antisemitism or even worse, a genocide against the Jews. In other words, irrespective of the facts and the arguments, Galloway elevated the Jews to a class above chriticism who could never be accused of the crimes of ethnic cleansing or genocide, as if they are not human:
'Imwas-al-Ramla, June 1967, The village was completely ethnically cleansed and then destroyed.
Galloway confirmed what Ezra Klein alluded to in another interview. It is not about the facts! The facts have to be denied and gaslit when they are capable of fomenting antisemitism! This has a profound ramification. Sadly, Scott Galloway and Ezra Klein are correct, and that raises a fundamental question: what do the Jews have to do when the truth has become antisemitic? Deny reality; gaslight the facts!
The unvarnished truth: love it, deny it, or hate it. Most Jews, since the Nakba, have been conflating anti-Israelism with antisemitism. For eight decades, it was good and dandy for them, and the utility of spreading the big lies about Palestine and its people started to run out of gas; thanks to social media. Thus, YES, we do agree: "antisemitism", as most Jews define it, is on the rise. In layman's terms: they got themselves into a pickle!
Sadly, Mr. Galloway, as a Jew, felt offended when confronted with the hard facts of the ongoing genocide, although he knows well that Israel didn't let in foreign journalists, like him, to enter the Gaza Strip to verify what he denies! Mr. Galloway was not offended when Israeli Jews killed more journalists than any in most conflicts aside from WWII.
After the Oct. 7th Raid, this Jewish cognitive dissonance went into overdrive when so many Jews framed Palestinians' return to their looted homes and lands as a genocide, although the Jews won't be a target for murder in whole or part. On the other hand, the same Jews deny Gaza's genocide because not all Palestinians are targeted! At length, we have addressed this topic in another section.
Soon after the Nakba was concluded, a popular "fiction" novella, Khirbet Khizeh, was written by a former Israeli soldier, S. Yizhar (Yizhar Smilansky), who served during the Nakba war of 1948, and it became widely popular and celebrated as a masterpiece of moral courage. In fact, the book became part of the Israeli high school curriculum in 1964! In a 1978 essay, Yizhar persisted in claiming that Khirbet Khizeh was merely "a work of fiction". On the other hand, his former commander during the 1948 war, Yehuda Be'eri, publicly shattered that defense. Be'eri confirmed that the events depicted in the book were historically accurate eyewitness accounts. Be'eri confirmed that the events depicted in the book were historically accurate eyewitness accounts, identifying them as the actual expulsion orders he issued for the Palestinian village of Khirbet al-Khisas and eight other nearby villages in the Gaza district on November 25, 1948. Ironically, Israel's top generals (Yitzhak Rabin and Moshe Dayan) corroborated similar war crimes in locations very close to those nine villages in the Gaza district.
Tantura-Haifa, May 1948, Note how men, women & children were separated just before the massacre
The broader irony lies in how state mythology evolved: while the immediate post-1948 generation recognized the physical expulsion in their literature and debates, later state narratives manufactured the lie that Palestinians "voluntarily abandoned" their homes. The existence of early works like Khirbet Khizeh is solid proof that everyone knew the truth, and that the "spontaneous flight" narrative was a post-hoc cover-up (we have uncovered similar myths that were concocted long after the Nakba). This creates a profound educational doublethink within Israeli society: in one high school classroom, students study Khirbet Khizeh in the official literature curriculum, reading about how their grandparents forcibly removed native villagers; in the very next classroom during a history lesson, they are taught the official propaganda that Palestinians fled voluntarily. This institutionalized doublethink is precisely how a state conditions a generation to execute and justify genocide while keeping its liberal conscience intact. If you care, we have addressed this topic in depth in another section.
A Pattern: All Settler Colonial Deny, Deny & More Denial
A Playlist Of Short Clips Of Jews Sharing Their DNA Test Results
If you have two minutes, we urge you to watch this brave American Jewish girl describing Israeli Jews' cognitive dissonance like no other. Trust us, it will be worth your time, but hang on to your seat first and watch her to the last second:
Albert Einstein's letter dated April 10th, 1948, predicted that the Zionist Jews who committed the massacre at Deir Yassin would bring a Nakba upon the Jews
For a psychoanalytic analysis of this phenomenon, Erich Fromm's Escape from Freedom is highly relevant. Written in the early 1940s to explain how Germans surrendered their freedom to fascists. Here is an interview with Mr. Fromm conducted by Mike Wallace in 1958, and here is a 26-minute summary of his book "Escape From Freedom". Fromm's arguments on mass psychological retreat from reality are arguably applicable to much of the contemporary Jewish community, suggesting a strange repetition of history.
The Zionist Version Of Lebensraum: A Map Of The Great Israel
Much to our surprise, Albert Einstein used the word catastrophe (a.k.a Nakba in Arabic) way before it was coined by Arabs a day after the Deir Yassin massacre on April 10th, 1948. That said, Albert, used the word catastrophe not in the Palestinian context, but rather in the Jewish context. YES, Herr Einstein predicted that the Zionists would bring a Nakba upon Jews! In other words, Einstein knew that Zionists fomented antisemitism by design where it never existed! Please allow Einstein's framing of the conflict to sink in for a minute and then reflect: when antisemitism was antisemitism ever bad for Zionism?
Ironically, the Jews used to use the word "catastrophe" so often, as we saw earlier with Arendt and Einstein, before Nakba, and they switched to using Shoah when Palestinians claimed it after 1948. We have addressed how certain words changed their masters in another section.
How do Palestinians Feel About Their Right of Return?
It should be noted that to this date, the Palestinian people have been demanding to exercise their right to return (which was endorsed by the UN) to their looted homes, farms, businesses, and lands. Sadly, this basic human right has been rejected even by the most "liberal" of world Jewry.
We URGE you to watch Professor Ilan Pappe's (an Israeli historian) summarizing Nakba in 90 seconds:
...and watch President Truman explaining the Nakba in plain English and the Americans' role in making it possible in 50 seconds. Pay attention to how Mr. Truman was talking as if he were the Colonial Secretary, as if nothing had changed to this date:
...or watch this great View by Mondoweiss explaining Nakba in under 90 seconds:
...and watch this brave American boy for two minutes only explaining why Nakba was necessary for Zionism to succeed and why Israel has to maintain a Jewish majority at all costs and at all times:
Here is an important clip of an Israeli describing the Nakba in vivid language. It was extracted from a much larger video recorded by Zochrot. Note how he discussed the ethnic cleansing and the dispossession of the indigenous people in the village of Huj. Pay attention to how described as peaceful. Ironically, before Nakba, we called them traitors because they were so friendly with the Zionist Haganah. Just in case you don't know where Huj is located, it is just a few kilometers from the northeastern tip of the Gaza Strip:
If you made it down here and still have the energy to learn more about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, we highly recommend visiting our short introductory section, which includes a brief list of articles on the conflict.
Palestinians Ask: Did Zionist Jews Give a Good Name For Refugees?
Finally, after reviewing all this evidence, we Palestinians have every right to ask: since many in the "civilized West" loves conflating Judaism with Zionism, do you honestly believe [Zionist] Jews gave a good name for refugees? God forbid, if another Jewish refugee crisis occurs in the future, would the "civilized West" refuse to receive Jewish refugees as they did in the 1930s and 40s? God forbid, if such a thing happens again, then who can blame any nation for refusing to take in such refugees? Who would welcome refugees who openly plot to replace them? Thus, was it a mistake to give them refuge? Those are legitimate questions that every Jew and Westerner should contemplate deeply. All we Palestinians ask is just a little empathy, or is that too much to ask?
I am very sympathetic towards the young American boy and agree with him about the occupation. At the same time language is important, and I’m afraid references to ‘far right nationalist organisations’ as a ‘problem’ cause me to step back. If ethnic nationalism is a ‘problem’ then what our friend supports for Palestinians he will very likely oppose when applied to whites currently undergoing an expulsion from their own homelands in the United States and Europe organised by the same unyielding forces. He is I suspect a social justice warrior and probably an internationalist - eager to render the world a borderless playground for the class of plutocrats now clutching at the world’s throat and all in the interests of an illusory ‘equality’ and ‘justice’ he simply doesn’t understand because he hasn't grasped all the connections. Opposition of this nature equates to cultural Marxism in practice. He makes good points it has to be said. Unfortunately I just don’t see how supporting one nation’s right to live in their own lands among their own people but failing to defend the same principle elsewhere - nations are bloodlines; that is what the word ‘nation’ means, furthermore nations do not survive very well without an exclusive territory of their own - leads to any other conclusion. And if this much is true then he likely approves of organisations like Antifa, BLM and all the other factions dedicated to disrupting and eventually destroying a civilisation he himself appears to have done rather well out of. I hope I'm wrong, and I must emphasise again that I applaud what he has to say. I just think he may need to rethink his terms of reference and his ideological position. We were - of course - all young once.
Menu
Palestinian Replacement In A Single Picture: al-Tira's school before and after Nakba. The same place, but different people 
Remind Us Please: Who shall push whom into the sea. This was the scene at Jaffa harbor, May 1948.
Palestinians were ethnically cleansed out of al-Ramla & al-Lydd in July 1948 by Zionist Jewish forces, as you see, based on direct orders from Ben-Gurion, and executed by Yitzhak Rabin.
'Imwas-al-Ramla, June 1967, The village was completely ethnically cleansed and then destroyed.
Israeli Jews looting al-Musrara Palestinian Quarter, Jerusalem 1948
Tantura-Haifa, May 1948, Note how men, women & children were separated just before the massacre
A Playlist Of Short Clips Of Jews Sharing Their DNA Test Results
Albert Einstein's letter dated April 10th, 1948, predicted that the Zionist Jews who committed the massacre at Deir Yassin would bring a Nakba upon the Jews
The Zionist Version Of Lebensraum: A Map Of The Great Israel
Over 700 Oral History interviews (including 3,500+ hours of recording) can be viewed online.
Post Your Comment
*It should be NOTED that your email address won't be shared, and all communications between members will be routed via the website's mail server.
انا فخور من ان امي و ابي من مواليد بلدة قوميا المحتلة و ان شاء الله ربنا يرجع الحق لصحابه