Haavara FAQs: Are you implies that Jews caused the Holocaust? Are you saying that the Zionists did collaborate with the Nazis?

Your presentation clearly implies that Jews caused the Holocaust: are you saying that the Zionists did collaborate with the Nazis?

NYTimes, as late as 1943, Zionist leaders were lobbying US Congress to block Jewish refugees' safe havens unless GB opened immigration into Palestine

This line of questioning often employs a classic Zionist tactic: conflating Judaism with Zionism to obscure facts. The evidence, however, demonstrates a clear distinction.

The Existential Crisis of Early Zionism and the Haavara Agreement

In the early 1930s, the Great Depression inflicted severe financial pain on Zionist enterprises, pushing the Jewish Agency toward liquidation. Facing an existential crisis, the Zionist movement was desperate. This explains their willingness to collaborate extensively with Hitler, even if it meant enabling a regime of oppression.

In exchange for Hitler bailing out Zionism, Zionist leaders provided a crucial service to the Nazis: they actively undermined the anti-Nazi boycott.

A Win-Win for Zionism and Nazism

The Haavara Agreement was a mutually beneficial transaction for both parties and was demonstrably not about saving Jews' lives. Tragically ironic, Hitler was willing to facilitate the emigration of German and Austrian Jews anywhere, even on luxury ships, until late 1941. Conversely, evidence suggests the Haavara Agreement was signed by Zionists primarily to save themselves. Furthermore, Zionists repeatedly risked and endangered Jewish lives --the Holocaust being just one instance-- whenever confronted with existential crises.

The Unique Culpability of Zionist Leadership

Fake Valor: Why Did Zionist Jews Hoist Nazis Flag on Their Ships in the 1930s?

While the normalization of trade, relations, or even alliances with Hitler by non-Jewish entities (such as the Mufti Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Vichy Government, or the Soviet Union via the infamous Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact) is often explained by the dictates of realpolitik and appeasement, the Zionist leadership's actions stand apart.

Zionist leaders were the FIRST to forge a pact with Hitler. This began even before most European nations were forced into collaboration and continued even as appeasement policies led to escalating repression against German Jews. The Haavara Agreement persisted unabated even after the Nuremberg Race Laws and the Kristallnacht pogrom of November 1938.

The Zionist leadership was therefore among the first to understand that appeasement would not only enable Hitler but would critically make him more confident, emboldened, and intransigent. Instead of correcting course, they doubled down on the Haavara Agreement. Had it not been for FDR shutting it down in late 1941, this arrangement with the Nazis might have continued until the end of the war! Mazeltov, Jews, give yourselves a big hand for this "wonderful gift" to humanity!

Decades of Defense and Acknowledgment

It is astounding that Zionists continue to defend the Haavara Agreement eight or nine decades later. We were shocked to find that even a founding father of the "Jewish state," Nahum Goldmann, reached a similar assessment post-factum, expressing incredible remorse and regret. This was no mere afterthought; Zionists were fully aware of the negative consequences of their policies as they executed them throughout the 1930s and 40s.

Did Zionists collaborate with the Nazis?

Fake Valor: Jewish-Brigade, Italy April - 1945: The Impostering Hero, see me while I bomb Nazis ONLY a few weeks before WWII ended. We wonder: were any similar selfies taken at the al-Alamein meat grinder?

Here is the unvarnished truth: Zionists of all shades NEVER saw the Nazis as the enemies, which explains why the majority of the Yishuv avoided fighting the Nazis to the bitter end, and defeating the Nazis was left for the Gentiles. On the other hand, when Zionist records are examined, it becomes clear that Zionists' top priorities were to defeat the British White Paper of 1939, and to prepare for the upcoming war with the Arabs. Let us not forget that two of Israel's future PMs, Menachem Begin & Yizhak Shamir, bombed allies' war efforts during WWII, and Lehi even reached for an alliance with Nazis as late as December 1941. YES, ladies and gentlemen, this happened while their families were being gassed in Poland. It should be noted that Palestinians during WWII CEASED resisting British colonization of their country, and most importantly 12,000 of them fought the Nazis!

Kastner Saved Lives Too: How does justifying Haavara after the fact not resemble Kastner's defense of what happened on his infamous train but at a much larger scale? Kastner too saved Live!

In the technical sense, does this evidence amount to collaboration with the Nazis? Technically, no. On the other hand, we can safely say that the Nazis & the Zionists were NEVER enemies, and for sure, the Zionists' policies and actions during the 1930s and 40s helped the Nazis. In other words, the relationship between both sides was collaborative on many fronts without an open military alliance, and the credit goes to Hitler (not to the Zionists), who rebuffed Lehi's partnership offer.

David Ben-Gurion envisioned that Nazis' Nuremberg Race Laws would become the LEVER that would end up creating the "Jewish state," but how? Click the image for the details

In the best of cases, the Zionist movement was guilty of intentional reckless endangerment. The evidence shows that the Zionist leadership worked hand over fist to close all windows in a burning house, and left one single exit open (Palestine) to Europe's Jewry to maximize their political gains. Ironically, it was David Ben-Gurion who referred to such a process as the LEVER that would end up creating the Jewish state.

proven already, Zionist leaders made sure that Europe's Jews were left with two options: either they made Aliyah to Palestine to join the yishuv or go to Auschwitz, and lobbied feverishly like hell against any viable third alternative. Sadly, this continued even after WWII ended in the DP camps. Just in case you think our characterization is over the top, wait until reading it from ChatGPT (who framed the two options as: land or coffin), or reading it from Ben-Gurion himself when the Holocaust was in its infancy:

The Lever of Disaster: The Patria, Ben-Gurion, and the Doctrine of Sacrificial Statehood

At the Biltmore Conference in May 1942 Ben-Gurion said: “The meaning of these two ships [Patria and Struma -- both were sunk during WWII with Jewish refugees onboard] is simple: Eretz-Israel or death-- and as soon as the war ends, many ships like these will stream to Eretz Israel.” (Beit-Zvi, p. 259)

[Two important points to keep in mind:

A) When Ben-Gurion said this statement, he knew that Patria was sunk by the Haganah based on Moshe Sharett's orders in Nov. 1940 (almost 16 months earlier ). That by itself was very telling.

B) The mass majority of Europe's Jewry after WWII ended immigrated to the Americas and preferred to live with the Gentiles even after Palestine was emptied of its people.]

Which hate speech was worse: Hitler's hate speech at the Reichstag on Jan 30th, 1939, or Ben-Gurion's speech (just two months before Hitler's speech) when he incited the murder of German Jews a month after the Kristallnacht?

Therefore, in practice, Zionists executed David Ben-Gurion's infamous antisemitic hate speech to the maximum to increase their leverage, which he articulated a month after the Kristallnacht pogrom. And when fomenting antisemitism could or might serve them, they often jumped on it with little hesitation & cheered. That is why Europe's Jews looked at them as the enemy from within, especially before their destruction during WWII. What is sad is that this reckless pattern continued at the height of the calamity, and all were fixated on Palestine to force England to open Palestine for unrestricted Jewish immigration.

Just in case you think what was written was a Palestinian anti-Zionist rant, please think twice. In Jewish communities around the world, this is an open secret. Actually, American Jews investigated Zionists' policies during the 1930s and 40s in the early 1930s, and they were quickly nixed.

Conclusion

Herzl Died Thinking Israel Would Have Been in Uganda, not in "empty" Palestine

Since the Zionist movement presents itself as a "Jewish national liberation" movement, then we are forced to ask: Can you honestly name a single Nazi who wasn't pro-Zionist? Can you honestly name one Nazi who was anti-Zionist? Can you honestly name one European antisemite whom Zionist Jews (from all shades of color) didn't work hand over fist with? Here's the shortlist: Russian Tsars and their antisemitic ministers, Symon Petliura, Arthur Balfour, Winston Churchill, Mussolini, Adolf Hitler, Reinhard Heydrich, Adolf Eichmann, Alfred Rosenberg, South Africa's apartheid regime, Otto Skorzeny, Argentina's military junta (see Tony Greenstein excellent research how something as Haavara was replicated in Argentina at the expense of Jewish lives, p. 190-192), Hermann Krumey, Kurt Becher, Dieter Wisliceny, the promoters of the so-called great replacement, teaming up with brown and black fascist shirt on the far-right to beat up pro-Palestine encampments, ..etc.

Palestinian Replacement In A Single Picture: al-Tira's school before and after Nakba. The same place but different people

Much to our surprise, we discovered that West Germany's de-nazification process after WWII was in practice nothing but re-nazification (more like rebranding in marketing). We were shocked to discover this has been an open secret.

For God's sake, even those in the far-right in Europe and the US (who are fighting against critical race theory, equity & diversity) are flocking to defend their fascist buddies, are you surprised? From its inception, Zionism adopted Martin Luther's antisemitic ideology (which Hitler later adopted), and Herzl instructed his followers: antisemites will become our best allies; therefore, why should we resist them? (The Transfer Agreement p. 226 & Zionist Relations with Nazi Germany by Faris Yahya p. 9-10)

Therefore, the Zionist ideology in practice is antisemitism; it brings antisemitism where it never existed. That explains why Europe's Jews turned against it and considered the Zionists the enemy from within. That is why Europe's Jews, before and after WWII, voted with their feet and immigrated to the Americas to live with the Gentiles and not to the emptied country of Palestine. That is why the Zionist leadership organized a quick airlift for Arab Jews (which was the first of its kind for so-called refugees) once their fears were confirmed that Europe's Jews overwhelmingly preferred somewhere else. It is simple and stupid: where antisemitism doesn't exist; Zionists will foment it if and when they find it serving their interests.